Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03851-02
Original file (03851-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TJR
Docket No: 3851-02
11 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States 

Codei Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 6 February 1946 at the age of 18. At
the time of enlistment you had completed 11 years of formal
education.

On 1 October 1946 you were convicted by deck court (DC) of
sleeping on watch and were sentenced to a $52 forfeiture of pay.
On 5 November 1946 you received captain's mast (CM) for wrongful
possession of another Sailor's dress blues.
imposed was extra duty for 40 hours.

The punishment

On 26 February and again on 3 April 1947 you received CM for a
one day period of unauthorized absence  
appointed place of duty.
general court-martial  
to confinement for 24 months, reduction in rate to seaman
apprentice 
On 22 May
1947 the sentence was mitigated to a bad conduct discharge (BCD)
and the period of confinement was reduced to 18 months.

(SA), and a dishonorable discharge (DD).

On 13 May 1947 you were convicted by

(CCM) of theft of $348.

(UA) and absence from your

You were sentenced

However, on 29 October 1947, this request

After the BCD was approved at all levels of

On 16 October 1947 you submitted a written request for
restoration to duty.
was disapproved.
review, on 21 May 1948 you were so discharged.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity, post service conduct, and character
reference letters.
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
discharge because of the serious nature of your theft offense and
your other misconduct.
denied.

Nevertheless, the Board concluded these

Accordingly, your application has been

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02786-02

    Original file (02786-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. You were sentenced to extra duty for three months and a bad conduct you were convicted by SCM of theft of .45 caliber pistol valued at The BCD was suspended for 12...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03412-07

    Original file (03412-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 21 May 1947, while in civil custody, the discharge authority directed discharge by reason of desertion for a 137 day period of UA and civil...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10963-02

    Original file (10963-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 13 June 1947, you were convicted by SCM of absence from your appointed place of duty and disobedience.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05757-00

    Original file (05757-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 December 1944 you were convicted by deck court On 18 October and on 3 November 1944 you received During the period from 12 February to 20 June 1945 you were convicted by DC on three occasions for a two day period of unauthorized absence (UA), drunkenness, and absence from your appointed place of duty. 15 months, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). evidence in your record, and you submitted none, to support your contention that you were told that the discharge would be Even if you were,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01731-06

    Original file (01731-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire ecord, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02770-02

    Original file (02770-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. April 1945 you received CM on two occasions for missing muster, On 22 March 1945 the DD was mitigated to a bad conduct On 3 February 1945 the confinement You were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2844-13

    Original file (NR2844-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 January 1947, you received deck court (DC) for two periods of UA.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06972-02

    Original file (06972-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01627-11

    Original file (01627-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 2 November 2011. During the period from 24 January to 6 November 1946 you received CM on two more occasions for disorderly conduct and failure to obey a lawful order. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07274-98

    Original file (07274-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 7274-98 26 March 1999 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. i threeimember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval A Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...