DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
3 October 2002
3902-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 October 2002.
injustice were.reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Boa,rd consisted
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
your naval record and applicable statutes,
support thereof,
regulations and'policies.
Documentary material considered by the
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 4
April 1983 at age 19 and immediately commenced a 36 months of
active duty.
drug screening urinalysis were positive for opiates.
On 25 April 1983 the results of your initial entry
On 9 May 1983 you were notified that separation action was being
You were
initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
On 11
advised'of and retained all of your procedural rights.
May 1983 a urinalysis screening was conducted during which you
denied any drug abuse and were found not to be drug dependent.
You provided a detailed statement on this date in which you
again denied any use of illegal drugs.
On 16 June 2001 your separation was approved, and on 21 June
1983 you received an uncharacterized entry level separation by
reason of misconduct due to drug abuse,
4 reenlistment code.
and were assigned an
RE-
Therefore,
Regulations authorize the issuance of an entry level separation
to individuals during their first 180 days of continuous active
the uncharacterized entry level
military service.
separation you received on 21 June 1983 was appropriately issued
since you were separated within the first 180 days of continuous
active military service due to your positive urinalysis for
opiates.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01703-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 15 September 2000 you received an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous entry due to drug abuse, and you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. as evidenced by the positive You were advised of and waived all of and you were assigned an RE-4 On 17 May 2000 you the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations require to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02585-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 WMP Docket No: 19 August 2002 2585-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500090
The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20031211 with an entry-level separation (uncharacterized) for defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment - drug abuse (A). Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than 1 month in the military to warrant a...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500070
The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to ‘reenlistment.’ The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20040517 with an entry level separation (uncharacterized) characterization for defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment - drug...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00386
Respectfully yours, Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 DD Form 149 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000329 - 000411 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 000412 Date of Discharge: 000503 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 00 22 Inactive: None I...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501157
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12864-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1401585
Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should read: "MISCONDUCT" The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00756-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Navy Drug Screening Laboratory, Great Lakes, reported a methamphetamine concentration approximately 8,072 concentration of 6,820 ng/mL, consistent with recent use of illicit methamphetamine. akey c. The information provided methamphetamine/amphetamine Correction of the urinalysis test result.