DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH: yrj
Docket No: 3901-02
16 July 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
l/249 of 21 June 2002, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
INTEDRITY DRIVE
YILLINDTON TN
38055-0000
S720
1160
Ser
21 Jun 02
811/7_~1'(
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Ref:
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 26 Feb 02
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) OPNAVINST
013/95
1160.6A
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner reenlisted on 20 April 1995 for six years
to attend the Nuclear Enlisted Commissioning Program (NECP).
petitioner held the nuclear propulsion NEC 3384 at the time of
reenlistment.
the NEC 3384 at the time the petitioner reenlisted.
petitioner did not receive the zone
reference
(b) because he was selected for the NECP.
Reference (b) listed a zone "A" SRB entitlement for
"A" SRB entitlement offered in
The
The
b. The petitioner was released from the NECP in October 1996.
The petitioner request SRB payment based on SRB eligibility
effective the date of reenlistment and after his release from the
NECP.
C .
Per reference (c),
members who reenlisted/executed an
extension for SRB prior to applying for an officer procurement
program requiring formal academic training, will have remaining
installments suspended as of their class start date.
are dropped from the program and return to enlisted status in the
same bonus skill,
rate reduced by the number of days spent in the program.
will receive the remaining installments but at a
Members who
d.
In accordance with enclosure
(l), exhibit A, paragraph I,
was an enlisted student, trained as a
prospective
Propulsion Training Course From March 1993 through September 1994.
During this time frame he applied to the NECP.
in the United States Navy's Nuclear
nuclear operator,
e.
Per reference (c),
members who reenlist/extend to obtain
Additionally,
sufficient obliserve for an officer program are not entitled to
SRB entitlement for eligible member who
SRB.
reenlist/extend after applying for an officer program, will be
held pending selection results.
may then receive SRB.
who are selected for participation, lose SRB entitlement.
Members who withdraw their application or
Applicants who are not selected
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
f.
The petitioner submitted the application to attend the
NECP approximately one year before reenlistment of April 1995.
Therefore,
entitlement offered in reference (b).
the petitioner is not eligible for the zone "A" SRB
In view of the above,
recommend the member's record remain as
2.
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
3 .
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
is returned.
Enclosure (1)
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09430-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02
The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06420-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION 2 NAVY OFNAVAL RECORDS ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ecb Docket No: 6420-03 28 October 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : .._ _ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD -.-,__ ._., .“..“._ ..-- _ .- _ _--. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05775-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02451-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . jiod ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III Recorder Acting Recorder 5 Pursuant to the delegation of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00743-02
1552 Encl : (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) (3) NPC memorandum 1 160 Ser 8 1 Sul3_ject’s naval record l/O27 of 4 April 2002 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be I. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for NEC 3384. He was discharged and reenlisted on 2/3 June 2001 (E4 over two years). Pursuant to...