Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03912-02
Original file (03912-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV

Y

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

MEH:mh
Docket No: 3912-02
16 July 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 16 July 2002.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 13 June 2002, a copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

N AVY PERSONNEL COMMAN

5720  INTEGRITY DRIV

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

D

E

13  Jun 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

(a) BCNR memo of 16 May 02
(b) Barring Act,

31 United States Code, 3702(b) (1)

(1)
(2)
(3)

DD Form 1883 of 28 Feb 80
undated

ltr to DFAS-CL

of 1 May 00

to a refund of Survivor Benefit
guidelines contained in reference (b).

recommend the BCNR not correct

record to reflect that he is entitled
Plan (SBP) premiums beyond the

2.

The recommendation is based on the following:

a.

198G.

29 February  
that he was single,
enclosure (1).
the SBP spouse category.

transferred to Fleet Reserve on

A review of his service records indicates

and had no eligible spouse beneficiary per
On 1 March 1980 he was erroneously enrolled in

b.

Reference 

(b) states in part,

that every claim against
the United States is barred unless such claim is received within
six years after the date such claim first accrued.
Act does not merely establish administrative guidelines; it
specifically prescribes the time within which a claim must be
received in order for it to be considered on its merits.
is no record,

except an undated letter written to the Defense

The Barring

There

nting Service-Cleveland (DFAS-CL) by
requesting correction of his record and a

total

Enclosure (3) is the DFAS-CL reply, though
refund of premiums.
they had no previous record that he requested termination of his
SBP participation.

Subj 

:

MENDATION ICO

Additionally,

"Shift Colors" (the retirees' quarterly

3.
newsletter) regularly provides information on various changes
and updates associated with the SBP.
as periodicals from various Navy fraternal organizations,
provides SBP information to the retired community on a routine
has received a Retiree Account
efense Finance and Accounting

This newsletter, as well

Service-Cleveland (DFAS-CL) where the deduction of SBP premiums
was clearly indicated though there is no record of him
contacting them in an attempt to correct this error.
and the Ret'
have helped
participation in the SBP had he sought su
BCNR does not rule favorably in his case,
still has the right to bring a civil action in an appropriate
United States Court.

(RAG), Kings Bay GA, would
in terminating his

PERS-62

Head, Retired Admin Section
Casualty Assistance and Retired
Activities Branch (PERS-665)

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10865-02

    Original file (10865-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 10865-02 22 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02423-02

    Original file (02423-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He did not elect to enroll his Petty Officer was offered "Shift Colors" (the retirees' quarterly newsletter) regularly 3. provides...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08756-06

    Original file (08756-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Memo of 28 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07863-06

    Original file (07863-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7863-06 4 January 2007This is in deference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08056-01

    Original file (08056-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, quarterly newsletter) PERS-62 and local Retired Activities Offices been available to provide information regarding SBP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00236-02

    Original file (00236-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ,,- -- _ - “ - _ it is clear that Senior Chief Bennett is not aware of Based on information contained in his application and the 3. enclosure, the criteria or procedures required to withdraw from the SBP. In response to Senior Chief * 4. widow can receive both SBP and portion of any SBP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07937-06

    Original file (07937-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Memo of 27 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08624-07

    Original file (08624-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8624-0711 December 2007 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 7 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05676-03

    Original file (05676-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on information contained in his application, it is clear that-is not aware of the criteria or procedures required to withdraw from the SBP. Reference (b) also states, in part, that a retired member was permitted to discontinue participation in the SBP during the period 17 May 1998 to 16 May 1999. retired pay, his Program Manager Survivor Benefit Plan, Retired Activities and GI Bill Programs Branch (PERS-664) DEPARTMENT O F THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEGRITY...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10678-06

    Original file (10678-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 13 Apr 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...