Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03798-02
Original file (03798-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

WMP
Docket No:
5 September 2002

3798-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and  
Board.
of your application,
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

together with all material submitted in

Your allegations of error and

procedures.applicable  to the proceedings of this

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 5 August 1986
for four years.
months of service in the Air Force from August 1974 until
February 1976 and more than two years of service in the Army
National Guard from December 1981 until February 1984.

Your prior active service consisted of about 18

Your record shows that a medical board was convened on 5
November 1986 and you were diagnosed with bilateral posterior
tibia1 tendonitis with medial tibia1 syndrome.
1986, the medical board report was completed and forwarded to
the Central Physical Evaluation Board (CPEB) for disability
evaluation.
board report, but  
in rebuttal.

You were advised of the contents of the medical

d$clined  the opportunity to submit a statement

On 14 November

On 30 January 1987 the CPEB found you unfit for duty and
directed your discharge due to a physical disability, that
existed prior to entry on active duty.
February 1987 you received an entry level separation and were
assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code.

Accordingly, on 13

Regulations authorize the issuance of an entry level separation
to individuals with prior active military service who are
separated after a break in service of more than 92 days.
Accordingly, the entry level separation you received on 13
February 1987 was appropriately issued due to the fact that your
last period of service ended in February 1984.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly,
The names and votes of the

You are entitled to have

In this regard,

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is' on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

it is important to keep in mind that

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06881-01

    Original file (06881-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2002. The recommendations of the medical board were to attempt to control the cluster headaches through medication and a six month period of limited duty. Additionally the Board considered the statements of your commanding officer concerning his investigation, your personal letter written concerning your positive urinalysis test and the fact that you were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00437-03

    Original file (00437-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 17 October 1983 to 23 June 1986, when you were discharged by reason of physical disability, with entitlement to severance pay, because of a left ankle condition. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10102-06

    Original file (10102-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that on 23 October 1985, the Central Physical Evaluation Board (CPEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of the residuals of injuries to the cervical spine that you sustained on 8 December 1984 in a motor vehicle accident, and that the disabilities were not ratable because you were injured as a result of your own misconduct. VA rating official denied your request, based on their determination that your disabilities were residual to the injuries...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03599-02

    Original file (03599-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2003. The medical record also discloses the petitioner was admitted to Naval Hospital, Long Beach, on 28 December 1979 and discharged on 11 February 1980 with the diagnosis: “Passive-Aggressive Personality Disorder”. The petitioner appeared before a Medical Board on 13 February 1980 with the above diagnosis and that Board found no evidence of psychosis...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03149-08

    Original file (03149-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 10 December 1986, you were counseled regarding your unacceptable performance, psychiatric diagnosis, advised where assistance was available, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00648-01

    Original file (00648-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    LTCOL E submitted a report of his investigation on 30 May 1986 and concluded that although MAJ S was disliked by many members of LTCOL E further found that HMM-364, he was a competent officer. On 17 December 1986, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) action was initiated against you for the following specifications of LTCOLs E and R, no disciplinary Documentation in the record indicates that on 1 He recommended charges be disrespect to a superior officer 3 disrespect, disobedience and dereliction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04078-00

    Original file (04078-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    action occurred on 30 June 1987 since administrative separation action was initiated on that same day due to your disciplinary actions, and other than the NJP of that day, the most recent such action was in January 1987, Additionally, it seems clear that some sort of disciplinary more than five months earlier. Point of contact is Mr. NAVMC re&est for removal 118(12) page 12 entries Director Manpower Management Information Systems Division 3 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2012-083

    Original file (2012-083.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PSC noted that the records show that the applicant repeatedly admitted that he had incurred his learning disability, which was what caused him to be unfit for duty, in a motorcycle accident in 1975; that the applicant stated in his rebuttal to the medical board report that his condition had improved while on active duty; and that the FPEB found, based on ample evidence, that there had been no increase in or aggravation of the applicant’s learning disability since his enlistment. He asked...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08884-02

    Original file (08884-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. absence due to aptitude, performance review board. resignation from and elected not to appear before a On 31 January 2001 the commanding You then submitted your On 6 December 2000 you WI11 On 6 February 2001 the Bureau...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03729-02

    Original file (03729-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Naval Military Personnel Command On 23 June Prior to your discharge on 23 June 1987, a Veterans Administration (VA)...