Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03807-02
Original file (03807-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

CRS
Docket No: 3807-01
12 August 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 7 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof,
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together-with all material submitted in support

your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

Your allegations of error and

considered your

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 21
September 1981.
punitive discharge, you received two nonjudicial punishments.
The offenses included use of marijuana and use of an unauthorized
pass.

Prior to the offenses for which you received a

A special court-martial convened on 14 July 1983 and found you
guilty of possession and distribution of marijuana on two
occasions and an unauthorized absence of 19 days.
sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for 150 days,
forfeitures of $380 per month for five months, and a bad conduct
discharge.
You received the bad conduct discharge on 16 October
1984.

The court

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
immaturity.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
not sufficient to  
due to the seriousness of the offenses.

wa'Srant recharacterization of your discharge

Based on the foregoing,

such as your youth and

the Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06886-97

    Original file (06886-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 15 April 1999 6886-97 Dear This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07358-09

    Original file (07358-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 February 1973. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03271-01

    Original file (03271-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You received the bad conduct discharge on 25 June 1985. Concerning the issue that the two nonjudicial punishments were not yours, the Board found that the 18 February 1983 nonjudicial punishment was found only on the court-martial documents under the section of prior nonjudicial punishments. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09159-10

    Original file (09159-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. The Board concluded that those factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your extensive disciplinary record, and the absence of credible evidence that you suffered from PTSD while in the Marine Corps. Comsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00119-02

    Original file (00119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. then vacated,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05336-02

    Original file (05336-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for a two year period of unauthorized absence, actions. the Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00103-02

    Original file (00103-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The record reflects that you served without incident until December 1980 when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for possession of marijuana.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07059-01

    Original file (07059-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00157-07

    Original file (00157-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 16 October 1985. You were discharged with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01183-02

    Original file (01183-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. officer properly concluded that you were not a suitable candidate for rehabilitation, given your four nonjudicial punishments. Therefore, the Board to an administrative discharge board.