Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03932-02
Original file (03932-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 3932-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

N130D1/02U0430 of 12 August 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV

Y

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

IN 

REPLY 

REFER 

TO

5420
N13 
12 Aug  2002

ODl/ 

OZUO430

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

NAVAL RECORDS

OF

Subj:

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#03932-02 with microfiche service

 

reccrd

The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman

1.
Cedar's petition.

N130 recommends denial of

2.
Enlistment Bonus (EB).

petition for an

enlisted in. the Navy on 19 January 2001 through

3.
the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) under the Job Oriented Basic
Skills (JOBS)
16 April 2001
Elec
Advanced 
In his petition,
program.
that would allow payment of an EB.

month extension for the
ted Technical Field (ATF)
requests favorable action

d Nine School Guarantee Program. On

EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the

4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
quotas provided by the Commander,
Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of
accession seats.
EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4.
-does not have an EB contract in his service record and
therefore is not entitled to an EB.

The EB program is budgeted based on

Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB.

Navy Recruiting Command and the

 

"A" School

5.

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

Programs  Branc h



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03840-02

    Original file (03840-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02442-02

    Original file (02442-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N 13 0 D2 22 Nov 2003 /02UO66& MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06895-02

    Original file (06895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO591 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN w Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06895-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02

    Original file (00249-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07125-02

    Original file (07125-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. would allow payment of an EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is included in her contract. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and s a valid EB Contract in the amount of $4,000 5. that payment upon completion of her training an pipeline and qualification in the skill for which she was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04554-03

    Original file (04554-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. 8 Aug 2'003 03UO563 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: OMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER 4 -: Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04554-03 with microfiche service record The 1. April 2001. favorable action that would allow payment of a $9,000 In her petition, Petty Officer -request She shipped to Recruit Training Command the Navy through the Delayed s EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02

    Original file (05739-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02888-02

    Original file (02888-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04604-02

    Original file (04604-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N which is attached. EB is guaranteed by an EB contract in his service record and Every recruit is not offered nor receives an The EB program is budgeted based on Navy Recruiting Command and the BCNR case...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03209-02

    Original file (03209-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. does not have an EB contract in his...