Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-02673
Original file (BC-2011-02673.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2011-02673 
   
  
 
   
COUNSEL:  NONE 
 
   
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
His current DD Form 214 reflects that he has continuous service 
from 1965 through 1986 but his Vietnam service is not referenced 
on the form.  Before he was discharged he told “records review” 
that his DD Form 214 did not include his Vietnam service.  The 
airman  stated  he  would  get  back  with  him  but  never  did.    He 
needs  to  verify  Vietnam  service  to  apply  for  Veterans 
Administration (VA) benefits.   
 
In support of his request the applicant submits copies of his DD 
Form 214, notarized letters from two former co-workers verifying 
his presence at Phu-Kat Air Base and Ben-Hoa Air Base Vietnam in 
1970 and 1971 and VA Form 21-22, Appointment of Veterans Service 
Organization as Claimant’s Representative dated 15 July 2011.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission  with  attachments  is  at 
Exhibit A.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on 
17 September 1965.    He  was  progressively  promoted  to  the  grade 
of Master Sergeant, E-7.  He retired on 30 September 1986 with 
an  honorable  characterization  of  service  and  was  credited  with 
serving  21  years,  and  14  days  of  active  duty  which  included 
8 years, 6 months and 12 days of Foreign Service.   
 
The  applicant’s  DD  Form  214  reflects  that  he  was  awarded  the 
Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign 
Medal (RVNCM). 
 

The VSM criteria:  The VSM was created by Executive Order 11213, 
8 Jul  65.    It  is  awarded  to  all  service  members  of  the  Armed 
Forces  who  between  4  Jul  65  and  28  Mar  73,  served  in  the 
following  areas  of  Southeast  Asia:    In  Vietnam  and  contiguous 
waters  and  airspace;  in  Thailand,  Laos  or  Cambodia  or  the 
airspace  thereof  and  in  the  direct  support  of  military 
operations  in  Vietnam.    The  applicant  must  have  served  30 
consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days to be eligible for award 
of the VSM. 
 
The  RVNCM  criteria:    This  medal  is  awarded  to  members  of  the 
armed forces of the United States who: 1) Served for six months 
in  South  Vietnam  during  the  period  1  Mar  61 to  28  Mar  73;  2) 
Served  outside  the  geographical  limits  of  South  Vietnam  and 
contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces for an 
aggregate of six months. Only members of the armed forces of the 
United  States  who  meet  the  criteria  established  for  the  AFEM 
(Vietnam) or Vietnam Service Medal during the period of service 
required  are  considered  to  have  contributed  direct  combat 
support to the RVN Armed Forces. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.    DPAPP  states  they  were  able  to 
verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service boots on the 
ground  in  Greece,  the  United  Kingdom,  Thailand  and  Germany  but 
not Vietnam.  DPAPP recommends disapproval since the information 
provided  in  the  Master  Personnel  Records  did  not  contain 
information that reflects that the applicant served in Vietnam.   
 
The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  18  November  2011  for  review  and  comment  within 
30 days.    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  not  received  a 
response.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.   
 

 

 

3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Therefore,  we 
find no basis to favorably consider this application. 
 
4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been  shown  that  a  personal  appearance  with  or  without  counsel 
will  materially  add  to  our  understanding  of  the  issue(s) 
involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application 
BC-2011-02673  in  Executive  Session  on  15  March  2012,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 15 July 2011, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 7 November 2011. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 November 2011.  
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634

    Original file (BC-2005-02634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    --The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03321

    Original file (BC-2010-03321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the VSM and RVNCM. The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 Dec 10 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00709

    Original file (BC-2011-00709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00709 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The time he spent in Vietnam is not recorded accurately. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01725

    Original file (BC-2008-01725.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01725 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: THE AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01875

    Original file (BC-2005-01875.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01875 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOSR), and his service in Vietnam. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00951

    Original file (BC 2014 00951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00951 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect military service in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots-on-the-ground in the Republic of Vietnam. The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03452

    Original file (BC-2012-03452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03452 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we do not find the evidence presented by the applicant is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01435

    Original file (BC-2011-01435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03271

    Original file (BC-2010-03271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03271 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part, after a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04289

    Original file (BC-2011-04289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VSM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who served at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, their contiguous waters, or the airspaces there over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Although the applicant received the VSM and RVCM, the award of these decorations did not require his actual presence in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...