Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1990-02453-4
Original file (BC-1990-02453-4.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-1990-02453-4
      
   						COUNSEL:  NONE
					
						HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded 
to honorable.

________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 31 May 1985, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 
request to upgrade his bad conduct discharge to honorable.  For 
an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the 
applicant’s request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision 
by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E.  

On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the 
applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration 
were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and 
relevant evidence.

On 15 November 2011, the applicant submitted another request for 
reconsideration. In support of his request, he submits a 
personal statement with several signatures and several letters 
of support.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of 
letters of support with a petition list.
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of the appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 
the previous decision.  We note the applicant’s contentions are 
essentially the same as stated in the original request.  The 
purported new evidence does not convince the Board that his 
discharge should be upgraded to honorable.  Therefore, in view 
of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of 
the applicant’s request.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-1990-02453 in Executive Session on 30 August 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

		, Panel Chair
      		, Member
		, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit F.  Record Of Proceedings, dtd 2 Jan 92, w/Exhibits
                A through D.
    Exhibit F.  Applicant’s letter, dated 15 Nov 11, w/atchs.




								
								Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1990 | BC 1990 02453 4

    Original file (BC 1990 02453 4.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and relevant evidence. In support of his request, he submits a personal statement with several signatures and several...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1990 | BC 1990 02737 2

    Original file (BC 1990 02737 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 2009, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit L). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant correcting the records to upgrade the applicant’s discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03156 ADDENDUM

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 5 June 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in our previous decision. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04234-2

    Original file (BC-2011-04234-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 5 November 2012 the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00611 ADDENDUM

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit E. The applicant submitted a letter dated 28 April 2011, requesting reconsideration. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In an earlier finding, the Board determined...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00887 ADDENDUM

    Original file (BC-2011-00887 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00887 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Medal for Humane Action (MHA) for his participation in the Berlin Airlift. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2000-01878-2

    Original file (BC-2000-01878-2.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his UOTHC discharge be upgraded. within the regulation and discharge The applicant‘s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge. Considering his overall record of service and the lack of post service information since his discharge, we are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1991 | BC 1991 01020 5

    Original file (BC 1991 01020 5.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-1991-01020 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. On 14 February 1953, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order 91, with a BCD. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00402-2

    Original file (BC-2009-00402-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00402 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) Discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 00249 2

    Original file (BC 2011 00249 2.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00249 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be upgraded. This is her second request, for the first request was denied just prior to the...