SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00052 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia be changed to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). 2. A correct diagnosis of dysosmia and loss of taste be rendered at the time of his medical discharge of 9 August 1972. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Similar appeals were considered and denied by the Board on 25 August 2009 and 23 August 2010. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit I. In an application to the Board dated 27 July 2011, the applicant requests reconsideration. He states his medical diagnosis at the time of discharge was not accurate. Due to this error he has been denied rights to VA benefits. Dysosmia and loss of taste would have been considered with the discharge diagnosis for nasal polyps. The VA has never conducted an exam for review of this illness but has denied benefits from discharge as a result. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit J. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant contends that he was given an inaccurate diagnosis at the time of his discharge and that, consequently, his disability rights have been obstructed. In his original appeal, he requested he be diagnosed as suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. In our previous review of this issue we agreed with the recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant to deny the requested relief and adopted his rationale as the basis for our decision the applicant was not the victim of error or injustice. Based on our review of the applicant’s latest submission and the case record, we again do not find that he has submitted evidence which supports that he was misdiagnosed and suffered from PTSD. Additionally, we considered the applicant’s new request to show that he was diagnosed with dysosmia and loss of taste at the time of his separation. In regards to this issue we concur with the evaluation previously prepared by AFPC/DPSDD that based on the evidence of record the applicant’s diagnosis at time of discharge was correct and that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process. Therefore, we find no basis to favorably consider the applicant’s request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00052 in Executive Session on 30 May 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00052 was considered: Exhibit I. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 2 September 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit J. DD Form 149, dated 27 July 2011, w/atchs.