Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04053
Original file (BC-2011-04053.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 
 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2011-04053 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
     
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
1. His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his award of the 
Purple Heart (PH). 
 
2. He be mailed verification of his award of the PH.   
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  received  notification  of  award  of  the  PH  by  mail  in  1962 
subsequent to his separation.   
 
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD 
Form 214.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  a  former  member  of  the  Regular  Air  Force  who 
served  from  8  November  1956  to  7  November  1960.    He  served  in 
Labrador, Canada, from 12 May 1957 to 10 May 1958.  On 7 November 
1960,  he  was  honorably  discharged  in  the  grade  of  airman  third 
class (E-2) after serving four years on active duty.  His DD Form 
214 reflects he served 11 months and 29 days of Foreign Service.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial.  DPSIDR states the PH is awarded 
for  wounds  or  death  as  result  of  an  act  of  any  opposing  armed 
force, as a result of an international terrorist attack, or as a 
result  of  military  operations  while  serving  as  part  of  a 
peacekeeping force.   
 
DPSIDR indicates that after a thorough review of the applicant’s 
military  personnel  records,  they  were  unable  to  locate  a 
certificate or special order verifying he was awarded the PH.  In 
addition,  the applicant provided no certificate, special order, 
eyewitness  statement,  or  medical  records  to  support  his  claim.  

Nor,  did  he  provide  a  detailed  statement  describing  the 
circumstances concerning an injury.   
 
DPSIDR  indicates  the  only  Foreign  Service  located  in  the 
applicant’s  military  service  records  was  to  Labrador,  Canada.  
Without contact with a hostile armed force, the applicant could 
not be entitled to the PH.   
 
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
Many  incidents  happened  between  1956  and  1962.    He  is  not  sure 
which  incident  was  referenced  in  the  letter  he  received  in  1962 
indicating he was awarded the PH for “above and beyond the call of 
duty.”  
 
The applicant’s complete rebuttal is at Exhibit E.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice  of  the  applicant's  complete  submission  in  judging  the 
merits  of  the  case;  however,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and  adopt  it’s  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion  the 
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
 

2 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2011-04053 in Executive Session on 30 May 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
 
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
The  following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04053: 
 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Oct 11, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 16 Nov 11. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 11.  
Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Jan 12.  

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
Panel Chair 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00176

    Original file (BC-2012-00176.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states orders initiating BLUE BAT action were TDY orders and as such do not require return orders. The Air Force has no evidence that this order was cancelled, and none that would indicate the applicant did not perform the duty as ordered. We believe the evidence provided is sufficient to support the applicant’s claim...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03016

    Original file (BC-2011-03016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with the Army of Occupation of Berlin criteria, members must have completed military service in Berlin, Germany for 30 consecutive days between 9 May 1945 and 2 October 1990 in order to qualify for the AOM. Furthermore, they are unable to locate official documentation verifying the applicant served in Berlin, Germany for 30 consecutive days during the Army of Occupation of Berlin inclusive period; therefore, they are unable to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the AOM. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00772

    Original file (BC-2008-00772.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00772 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with one Bronze Service Star (AFEM w/1BSS), the Air Force Enlisted Aircrew Badge, and the Air Force Aircraft Maintenance Occupational Badge. The applicant’s military record does...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02307

    Original file (BC-2010-02307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he was awarded: a. The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence which would lead us...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01863

    Original file (BC-2011-01863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was no medical documentation provided which would verify the aircraft crash and his resulting injuries were the direct result of enemy action. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s advocate reiterates the applicant should be entitled to the PH Medal due to the fact the applicant was taking fire during landing. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00025

    Original file (BC-2011-00025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Mar 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00025 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03822

    Original file (BC-2010-03822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03822 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the following: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and PH. DPSIDR states the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04211

    Original file (BC-2011-04211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received stitches for a head injury. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 12 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04838

    Original file (BC-2011-04838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04838 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Cuban Conflict Medal. The AFEM is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who after 1 July 1958, participated in U. The complete DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00095

    Original file (BC-2009-00095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR states the applicant does not provide any documentation proving he was awarded the BSM w/1 OLC. DPSIDR notes the Belgian Congo was not considered to be an opposing armed enemy force of the United States. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH w/1OLC or BSM w/1OLC.