AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01177
DPSOA states that it does not make sense to change the applicants DD Form 214 when it reflects the correct RE code. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01179 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. He was found guilty of all charges and specifications and sentenced to a bad conduct discharge (BCD), confinement for 48 months, forfeiture of all pay...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01182
On 26 Apr 99, AFPC/DPPRA informed him that during the time he served in Vietnam his unit was not eligible for the RVNGC. HQ AFPC/DPSIDR's completion evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a copy of the criteria for the RVNGC which states US Military units were individually cited for award of the RVNGC; however, the Vietnamese Government issued the award to all units...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01185
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence, that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the VSM, SAEMR or AFTR.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01187
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code 4J (Entered into Phase I of the Air Force Weight Program, or the unit commander has declared the airman ineligible to reenlist for a period of Phase II or probation) be changed to allow her to enlist in the Reserves. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01193 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with 25 years, 7 months and 16 days of creditable service for pay purposes as reflected on his DD form 214 and retirement order. Accordingly, we recommend the records be corrected as indicated below. The following documentary evidence was...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01197
The applicant did not provide any medical records that document the incident or eyewitness statements that support her contentions. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicants complete submission, we find no evidence the former members records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01197 in Executive Session 12 Nov...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01203
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01203 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4K (Medically disqualified for continued service, or the airman is pending evaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board/Physical Evaluation Board (MEB/PEB)) reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenlist. The DD Form 214 reflects the status...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01611
By virtue of a DD Form 149, dated 24 Oct 12, with attachments, the applicant requests reconsideration of her case, indicating that a miscommunication with the AFBCMR staff precluded her from being able to provide comments or file a Complaint Pursuant to Article 138, UCMJ in regard to the Command Directed Investigation (CDI) that was used by the Board to make a determination in her case. Additionally, according to documentation provided by the applicant, the 12th Air Force Commander, when...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 02357
Nevertheless, she should have been rated for PTSD and migraine headaches in addition to her 40 percent rating for Fibromyalgia. The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends consideration for restoring the applicants ten percent disability rating for her migraine headaches, such that when combined with the 20 percent rating for her fibromyalgia, a combined disability rating of 30 percent would be...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 02949 2
On 12 Nov 14, SAF/MRBR provided the applicant with an opportunity to submit information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service. In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 14, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 03594 3
On 4 Aug 10, the Board considered and denied the applicants request noting there was no evidence to show the applicants service connected medical condition met the criteria for compensation under CRSC. On 21 Mar 13, the Board considered and denied the request indicating the evidence was not sufficient to support crediting the applicant with the requisite 20 years of active service to qualify for CRDP or to override the earlier decision concerning his request for CRSC. By applications...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-1990-01004
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 Dec 90, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his records be corrected to show he was awarded the DFC and two PUCs. As the applicant has been previously advised, reconsideration is provided only where newly discovered relevant evidence is presented which was not available when the application was submitted. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-1990-01998
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1990-01998 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to an active duty position with the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 17 July 1991, that part of the applicant’s original request...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-1994-04265
On 21 September 1995, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s appeal requesting that his EPR closing out 5 October 1990 be removed from his records. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered both the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any previous application. The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s request for reconsideration of AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-1996-03658-2
After considering the evidence provided, the Board determined it was insufficient to find error or injustice and denied the application (see the Record of Proceedings (BC-1996-03658) at Exhibit E, with attachments). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 11 June 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member Mr. Kurt...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2003-00371
On 4 January 2008, the applicant provided additional evidence and requested reconsideration of his application (Exhibit H). The disability rating criteria for OSA differed greatly between the Department of Defense (DoD) under Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39, and the DVA under guidelines outlined in the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation from the military service. The following members of the Board considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2003-01247
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01247 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be considered for supplemental promotion consideration to Master Sergeant (MSgt) in cycle 03E7. However, DPPPWB recommended, even if the Board granted the award as requested, that he not be considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2004-01454 (2)
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01454 INDEX CODE: 111.05 COUNSEL: NONE ( HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions discharge) be upgraded to honorable and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2004-02649
On 30 Nov 04, the Board denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded. A copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit C (with Exhibits A through B). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004- 02649 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 09 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. --------------, Panel Chair Mr. --------------, Member Ms. --------------, Member The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2005-01223-2
There is material error and injustice involved for not only himself, but hundreds of other Air Force personnel who served on the ground in Laos, but whose individual personnel records do not reflect the location of their service. c. It is an injustice that the Board relies on the individual personnel records since those records do not reflect service in Laos where Agent Orange was used. If his records did not show service in Vietnam the DVA would have denied his claim.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2005-01773
On 19 Sep 96, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his UOTHC discharge to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2005-02374
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02374 INDEX CODE: 112.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, he be awarded additional constructive service credit (CSC) for his master’s degree in biochemical engineering and for his professional experience in the Canadian Forces. Applicant’s complete response, with...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-002261
AFPC/DPSD recommends the applicant’s case file, medical records, and related documents be reviewed by the AFBCMR to determine what actions should be taken regarding his request. The medical community did, in fact, “drop the ball” as he was released from active duty and transferred to the Reserve Retired List after it was determined that he was unfit for duty and could not perform the job for which he was trained. He had a medical condition that made him unfit for military service and, by...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-02598
Eligibility rules for the receipt of CRDP require a Reserve component member to be receiving Reserve retired pay. The previous board’s action did not result in the decedent receiving Reserve retired pay - it only made him eligible to receive retired pay when he reached 60 years of age. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 31 Oct 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-02835-2
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any previous application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-02989
The basis for the commander’s recommendation was that he signed an enlistment document stating he had no previous military service on 21 Feb 80, when he had served on active duty in the United States Army from 26 Mar 79 to 26 Jul 79, and he signed an enlistment document indicating he had never been treated for mental illness and had never been a patient in any type of hospital. On 1 May 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant request to upgrade his general (under...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-03072
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The injury to his left foot occurred under conditions simulating war. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to show that his ankle and back were the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02065
The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-02065 in Executive Session on 14 January 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 Sep 07, w/atchs. Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02074
The special order was amended by Special Order AC-010916, dated 15 Sep 08, to reflect the applicant’s service for basic pay (24 years and 28 days), active service for retirement (23 years, 6 months, and 1 day), and his service per 10 USC 1405 (23 years, 6 months, and 10 days). A complete copy of the AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02137
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR notes that while serving as a first sergeant and attached to the Army, the applicant was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), Iraq from 5 Dec 04 to 5 Apr 05. They recommend the Board review the nominating official’s original...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02140
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02140 INDEX CODES: 111.02, 131.09 COUNSEL: RICHARD V. STEVENS HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 2005B (CY05B) Major Central Selection Board (CSB) be declared void and removed from his records, and a reaccomplished...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02312
The Air Force investigate and report Dr. A--- B--- and Dr. K--- B--- for providing false testimonies in the adverse privileging action taken against him. Both of their records now contain the fact that an adverse action was taken against the applicant’s' privileges while at the 48 MDG. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s requests that the Air Force provide a letter directing that he is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02461
The mole was removed in Jun 04, and he completed a deployment to Afghanistan in Jul 06. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. HQ AFRC/AQBB’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02503
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/JA recommends relief, and states, in part; the applicant suffered a downgraded EPR due to lack of training and lack of response from her supervisors or chain of command. The evidence of record clearly establishes that she was not being properly trained and that her chain-of-command was derelict in training her. At the request of the applicant’s counsel, the DoD/IG reexamined the documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02598
DPSIDR states, in part, that after a thorough review of the applicant’s great-uncle’s military record, they are unable to find supporting documentation to indicate he was recommended for the award of the SS or DFC. Unfortunately, the applicant cannot recommend his great- uncle for award of the SS or the DFC. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2007-02598 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02718 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, states item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member's continuous active military...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02993
There is no evidence he submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage during the required time following their divorce. The Agency Legal Advisor indicates that, in his view, the Board has the legal authority to correct the record as requested, especially if it determines the legal requirements to make a deemed election were met. A complete copy of the Legal Advisor’s evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03234
OSD General Council determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03235
OSD General Council determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03258
An MSM covering three years of his service, to include his successful squadron commander tour, was processed late and narrowly missed being part of his “as met” record for the CY07A Colonel CSB. When several senior officers reviewed his record after the board, their number one observation was that the biggest detractor in his record was the lack of an MSM for his command tour. The applicant provided a DÉCOR 6, dated 20 March 2007, as additional evidence that his leadership intended the MSM...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03726
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and H. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-RPB-TQAL/CL indicates that in order to make an election into the SBP open season, a payment of a buy in premium was required to cover the period of time...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03902
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS concurs with the ANG subject matter expert (SME) and recommends denial of the applicants request for participation point credit during the time he was involuntarily discharged. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00154
The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial of his request to change his DD Form 214 to indicate a date of separation of 10 Sep 90 and indicates the finance system cannot confirm he took terminal leave prior to his separation from the Air Force. He did not submit documentation to substantiate an error in his separation date. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00220
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request for granting establishment of the designation that his PTSD was the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war, during a period of war. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant, through his service representative states...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00436
On 20 Nov 06, the request was disapproved by the MPF Chief and the Mission Support Squadron (MSS) commander, stating that in accordance with AFI 36- 2605, Air Force Military Personnel Testing System, the applicant’s excuse was not a valid reason to reschedule testing, promotion testing time is never changed, and that he was informed of the correct time to report for testing. The testing time never changes and is always at 0750. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00444
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00444 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was medically retired from the Air Force on 8 June 2007 due to a back injury considered in the line of duty (ILOD). On 28 March 2006, he had requested an LOD determination for a lower...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00683
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate that, on 30 Sep 07, she resigned from all appointments in the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3207 (Completion of Required Active Service). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00735 INDEX CODES: 111.02, 126.03 131.09 COUNSEL: GARY R. MYERS HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letters of Reprimand (LORs) dated 4 Oct 04, 23 Feb 05, and 18 Jul 05, be declared void and removed from her records. Her Referral Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) closing 27 Mar 05 and 15 Aug 05 be...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00762
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00762 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that she was permanently retired by reason of a physical disability. Therefore, he recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect she was permanently retired with a disability rating...