Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02461
Original file (BC-2007-02461.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-02461
            INDEX CODE:

      XXXXXXX (DECEASED)     COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be credited with additional active duty service for  the  period
of 7 Feb 04 – 9 Jul 07.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have remained on active duty orders from 7 Feb 04 through
9 Jul 07, until his treatment was resolved.

Between Mar and Jul 03, he developed Squamous Cell Carcinoma  which
started as a bump on his right cheek (developing into a mole) while
deployed to Iraq in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF).   The
development of the skin cancer was due to excessive exposure to the
sun.  After  completing  a  second  OIF  tour,  he  sought  medical
attention in May 04.  The mole  was  removed  in  Jun  04,  and  he
completed a deployment to Afghanistan in Jul 06.   While  deployed,
he noticed a lump on the right side of his neck.  The diagnosis  of
the lump involved the skin cancer which had spread  from  the  mole
sight to his lymph nodes.  The treatment of this condition involved
a lymphoidectomy and several rounds of chemotherapy  and  radiation
therapy which occurred between Oct 06 and Feb 07.

In support of his  appeal,  applicant  submits  an  AFRC  IMT  348,
Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated 6 Apr07; an active  duty
tour order from 10 Jul 07 – 7 Sep 07, other supporting documents.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant, an Air Force  Reserve  Technical  Sergeant  (TSgt),  was
placed on active duty orders for the period 23 Feb 03 – 6  Feb  04.
A Line of Duty Determination (LOD) was initiated on 4  Mar  07  and
finalized on 4 Jun 07 as In the Line of Duty (ILOD).  He was placed
on continuous active duty orders during the period of  10 Jul 07  –
10 Apr 08 at which time he was permanently  disability  retired  in
the grade of  TSgt  with  a  compensable  percentage  for  physical
disability of  100  percent,  effective  11  Apr  08.   Applicant’s
AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report indicates he was placed
on profile “4,” unable to perform military duties was dated 21  Sep
07.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFRC/A1BB  reviewed  this  application  and  recommends  denial.
Applicant was on active duty orders for the period of 23 Feb  03  –
6 Feb 04.  He was treated on 7 May 04 for a malignant  melanoma  of
skin that he developed while deployed to Iraq.   He  had  no  prior
history of skin disorders.  An LOD was initiated on 4  Mar  07  and
finalized on 4 Jun 07 as ILOD.

SAF/AA  Policy  Memorandum  provides  guidance  to  return  Reserve
members unable to perform military duties as a result of an  injury
and/or illness incurred or aggravated in the line of duty to active
duty.  Entitlements under  subject  policy  shall  begin  when  the
condition renders the airman unable to perform military duties; not
when the injury occurred or  when  the  airman  was  released  from
active duty.

HQ AFRC/AQBB’s complete submission, with attachment, is at  Exhibit
B.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 1 Aug 08 and 10 Oct 08 for review and comment  within  30  days.
As of this date, no response  has  been  received  by  this  office
(Exhibit C).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case.  HQ AFRC/A1BB has conducted a thorough review of the evidence
of record and addressed the issue presented in this application and
we  are  in  agreement  with  their  opinion  and   recommendation.
Therefore, we adopt the rationale expressed as the  basis  for  our
decision that the applicant has failed to  sustain  his  burden  of
proof of having suffered either an  error  or  injustice.   In  the
absence  of  persuasive  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief  sought  in  this
application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2007-02461 in Executive Session on 8  January  2009,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
      Ms. Michele M. Rachie, Member
      Mr. Kurt R. LaFrance, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Jul 07, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFRC/A1BB, dated 29 Jul 08, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 08.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 Oct 08.




                                   JAMES W. RUSSELL III
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03578

    Original file (BC-2007-03578.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The LOD was not completed and a final determination was not provided. The LOD was initiated again on 4 Apr 06 and was finalized on 17 Nov 06 with the finding of “Existed Prior to Service-LOD Not Applicable.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/SGP recommends the requested relief be denied. SGP states a review of the applicant's medical records found the medical condition was addressed by the supporting reserve medical unit with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-02196

    Original file (BC-2008-02196.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her case was referred to the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when her AD orders were terminated. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1BB recommends approval of active duty pay and points for the period of 27 May 07 through 31 Jul...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04572

    Original file (BC-2010-04572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04572 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears as though the applicant is requesting that her lower back pain condition be determined to be in the line of duty (LOD). She had five such determinations completed. Therefore, in view of the AFBCMR Medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03762

    Original file (BC-2011-03762.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Eight-Year Rule states “a disabling condition will be found to be in the line of duty, even though the condition EPTS, if the member has at least eight years of service, and the member was on active duty orders specifying a period of 30 days at the time the condition became unfitting, as subsequently determined by a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).” The applicant has over eight years of active duty, and therefore, his disability should have been found to be in the LOD as a matter of law....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118

    Original file (BC 2013 00118.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03777

    Original file (BC-2010-03777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03777 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00540

    Original file (BC-2008-00540.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    An AF Form 356 (Informal Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board) (IPEB), dated 19 January 2007, recommended permanent retirement at a 40 percent compensable rate. A1BB states that IAW DODI 1241.2, Reserve Component Incapacitation System Management; the member must demonstrate a loss of Earned Income as a basic requirement to qualify for C-Pay. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04677

    Original file (BC-2012-04677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04677 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED SERVICE MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased spouse’s Line of Duty (LOD) determination for his active duty period of 3 Jan 11 to 18 Mar 11 be changed to reflect in LOD-Yes or LOD-Existed Prior to Service (EPTS)/Service Aggravated, versus EPTS-LOD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 00563

    Original file (BC 2008 00563.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Another AF Form 388 was accomplished on 7 November 2004 and found the lesion ILOD. The evidence of record is unclear as to why it took unit officials some 18 months to accomplish an AF Form 388 indicating the applicant’s injuries suffered in March 2003 as ILOD. It appears the applicant continued to serve beyond his demobilization date thereby indicating he was somewhat fit for duty and not necessarily eligible for continuation on active duty for the time frame he is asking for.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00019

    Original file (BC-2009-00019.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve (AFR) on 28 Jul 75. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. Exhibit G. Letter, Counsel, dated 17 Sep 09.