RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02137
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal
(BSM). In the alternative, he be awarded the Meritorious Service
Medal (MSM) or the the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) with Valor.
If a BSM, MSM, or AFCM with Valor is approved, he be provided
supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of chief master
sergeant.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While he was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), his commander submitted
him for the BSM. He was attached to the Army and performed 22 convoys
as a gun truck escort, many of which came under multiple attacks. The
BSM was submitted in Feb 05 through Army channels; however, it was
returned to Balad AB in May 05 because the Army stopped processing
decorations on Air Force personnel. To prevent the BSM nomination
from being processed late, it was destroyed and replaced with an Air
Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). This was unfair and unjust, as the
BSM had already been placed in official channels.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of AF IMT
3994, Recommendation for Decoration Deployment/Contingency Operations,
an Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), deployment orders, a certificate
of recognition, documentation pertaining to the BSM, and other
documents associated with the matter under review.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates
the applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
chief master sergeant (CMSgt), with a date of rank of 1 Jan 08. His
Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 27 Feb 81.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the
Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and D.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDR notes that while serving as a first sergeant and attached
to the Army, the applicant was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), Iraq
from 5 Dec 04 to 5 Apr 05. He was a crewmember in over 20 convoys
constantly under attack and provided emergency medical treatment for
personnel injured during multiple convoy attacks while patrolling over
the most dangerous roads from Baghdad to the Turkish border.
According to AFPC/DPSIDR, it is clear the applicant’s supervisor
nominated him for the BSM for his service during his deployment.
However, the BSM recommendation was returned to Balad, destroyed, and
rewritten as an AFCM by someone other than the original nominator. In
AFPC/DPSIDR’s opinion, the BSM was placed in official channels but was
not properly considered by the AFCENTAF board. They recommend the
Board review the nominating official’s original decoration for a
determination and appropriate consideration. If the Board approves
the BSM, it should direct the AFCM be removed from the applicant’s
official records and replaced with the BSM or a more appropriate
medal.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 18
Jul 08 for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
SAF/MRBP recommends denial indicating the applicant has not produced
compelling or hard evidence to support his claim. In their view, most
of the evidence presented was based on hearsay from sources rather
than official documentation.
A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 13
Nov 08 for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the SAF/MRBP
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The
applicant has not presented evidence which shows to our satisfaction
that the decision to award him the AFCM was in error or unjust. In
view of the foregoing, and in the absence of sufficient evidence to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-02137 in Executive Session on 21 Aug 08 and 16 Dec 08, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
Mr. Elwood C. Lewis III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jul 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 14 Jul 08.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jul 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBP, dated 13 Nov 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Nov 08.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03827
He was recommended for a BSM while serving in a combat zone and performing duties outside the wire in areas routinely attacked by insurgents and this award should not have been downgraded for being non-combat. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his MSM certificate, dated 3 Sep 08 (Permanent Order #285-008), DA Form 638, Recommendation for Award; AF IMT 77, Letter of Evaluation, Memorandum from AFPC/DPSIDR, Memorandum to AFCENT A1 Decorations, and email and phone...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-03390 Disapproval
The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did not realize this application was being submitted as a request for reconsideration of his MSM. Evidence has been presented that his decoration package was never forwarded through, or endorsed by, the deployed wing commander. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00645
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00645 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) in lieu of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) awarded him on 20 Aug 90. DPSIDR notes they were unable to locate the recommendation for award of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01320
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR states the Board needs to consider the merits of the applicant’s request for upgrade of the MSM to BSM. As of this date, this office has not received a response. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02624
While it is noted the applicants AF IMT 3994, Recommendation for Decoration Deployment/Contingency Operations, dated , does not mention the BSM, and the applicant does not have a recommendation for upgrade from someone with firsthand knowledge of the act/achievement, preferably from someone within his chain of command at the time of the act/achievement, a proposed citation, or eyewitness statements, AFPC/DPSIDR believed based on the MSM recommendation package the applicant's actions were at...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03780
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. In regards to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM), we note that the Air Force office of primary responsibility has verified the applicant’s entitlement and has...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03891
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial noting there is no evidence of a recommendation to upgrade the AFCM or official documentation concerning the disapproval and downgrade of the initial recommendation for the AmnM. The applicant did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03112 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to include the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) on his DD Form 214. While the applicant was unable to provide a copy of the orders approving the MSM, he was able to provide a signed certificate and validated...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01113
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were sent to the applicant on 9 May and 16 Jun 08, respectively, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02017
Therefore the only remaining issue before the Board is the award of the ICM. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 15 September 2006, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...