AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02328
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02328 INDEX CODE: 105.01 COUNSEL: JOHN N. PAGE III HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated in appellate leave status to complete his General Court- Martial (GCM) appeal process from the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) to the Court of Appeals...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02335
INDEX CODE: 102.07 BC-2006-02335 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02337
INDEX CODE: 137.04 BC-2006-02337 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02356
DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. LAURENCE M. GRONER Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02357
The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAT provides no recommendation. DPPAT states the AFDRB’s approval to upgrade the applicant’s discharge to honorable does not by itself grant MGIB entitlements. A separation code of KDH – Hardship, allows the VA to provide MGIB benefits to a member based on the number of months he served under honorable conditions.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02367
He was in the Air Force Reserves at the time of the Naval Reserve promotion board approval; therefore, the promotion is not transferable. If he had any idea he was not going to be promoted in the Air Force he would have waited a month before signing the Air Force contract. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02374
The applicant enlisted in Aug 85 and his HOR was listed at that time. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02376
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends the requested relief be denied. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02377
On 9 December 1981, the discharge authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 2-78, for the good of the service, with a type of discharge as under other than honorable conditions. On 20 February 2007, a letter was forwarded to applicant suggesting that he consider providing evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. Exhibit C. FBI Identification Record Number 234583W5, dated 9 Feb 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02386
In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD provides a review of the applicant’s medical records and states that in his original application, the applicant indicated his conditions were the result of “strenuous activities over time. It appears the applicant is requesting his medical records be amended to include a statement that he was involved in an accident during WWI that caused traumatic injury to his back and neck.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02389
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02389 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 FEBRUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). We took notice of the applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he sustained while performing equipment...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02396
He agrees with the recommendation of the Air Force, if his citation does not verify his decision was beyond the call of duty neither the AM or DFC is appropriate (Exhibit E). Congressman Shimkus, in a letter dated 18 December 2006, offers his support in the applicant’s request for an upgrade of AM w/4 OLCs (Exhibit F). On 10 January 2007, the Board staff requested the applicant to provide clarification regarding his request for an upgrade of his AM w/OLCs (Exhibit G).
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02400
On 23 October 2006 and 28 November 2006, SAF/MRBR informed the applicant that his records had been destroyed by a 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, Missouri, and requested his assistance to reconstruct missing documents, facts and circumstances associated with his discharge. His assistance was requested, however, he did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing; therefore, no corrective action...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02401
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02401 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 February 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. DPPPRA states there is no evidence in the applicant’s military or medical records to support he was injured as a direct...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02412
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02412 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While there is no clear request listed by the applicant, it appears he wants his Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 14 November 2003 to 13 November 2004, section VI, Line 8 changed to read “Powered 1st AMC mission to Iran in 23...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02431
The applicant was properly advised of his options and the requirements of the law and elected not to respond; therefore, the automatic election of immediate coverage for spouse was given as required by law. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02432
On 19 December 1994, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force for having a mental disorder that interfered with military service. The applicant is requesting the narrative reason for discharge be corrected to reflect “Bipolar Disorder.” The applicant was diagnosed with Personality Disorder and was separated from the Air Force because his Personality Disorder interfered with his military service. The applicant’s personnel and medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02434
A Medical Board Report, dated 8 August 1995, indicates a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnosed the applicant with Patellofemoral Arthralgia which existed prior to service and interfered with basic military training. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02446
AFBCMR BC-2006-02446 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02449
DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 November 2006 for review and comment within 30 days of each letter. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02452-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02452 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his rank reflect staff sergeant (SSgt) rather than private. In reference to the PH, he believes he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02455
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02455 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEBRUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, Right and Left Knee Prosthesis and Degenerative Arthritis of the Lumbar Spine be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02476
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02476 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to delete Disability, Existed Prior to Service (EPTS). DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02479
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. NOVEL Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, 26 January 2007 AFBCMR BC-2006-02479 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2006-02488 INDEX CODE: 100.05, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 February 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered by Special Selection Board (SSB) by the Calendar Year 2003B (CY03B) (8 Dec 03) (P0403B) Major Central Selection Board (CSB) with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02494
Furthermore, the applicant failed to respond to a request to provide documentation in support of his request. Mr. W. H., Veteran of Foreign Wars Post 4203 provided a letter dated 23 November 2006, stating the applicant’s military service started 3 July 1963 and he was released from active duty on 9 May 1967. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 8 Aug 06, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02509
On 20 October 2003, following his records being reviewed by the military disability evaluation system, the applicant was relieved from active duty and place on the Temporary Disability Retirement List. DPPPRA states the Purple Heart Review Board disapproved the applicant’s request for award of the PH Medal on 25 October 2006. The AFPC/DPPPRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 3...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02516
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s master personnel record (MPR) appears to have been lost or destroyed. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02526
Applicant was disciplined for four minor infractions, but review of both her personnel and medical records reflects a continuous problem with her duty performance related to both personal and medical issues, including sleep hygiene, attitude, motivation/interest, and ADHD diagnosed by Air Force mental health professionals. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02527
The Medical Consultant opines that if the applicant elected not to have any injury recorded on his record, it would be unlikely that this previously non-reported injury would be sufficient to cause medical problems forty years later. The evidence of record does indicate that he did have several episodes of back problems that resolved quickly while on active duty. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02543
They further state Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36- 2803, paragraph 3.3, states “Forward all recommendations through the normal chain of command of the person being recommended. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation is attached at Exhibit E. HQ AFPC/DPSO recommends the applicant’s request to have the LOR dated 20 September 2005 removed from her records be denied. The applicant did not provide persuasive evidence to establish that the LOR she received was unjust or unwarranted; the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02555
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit D. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Absent persuasive evidence, applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02559
The parties divorced on 7 July 1998, and the court ordered the former member to maintain the SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf; however, neither party submitted a valid election change during the required time. Specifically, as noted by the Chief, Administrative Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General, in his memorandum of 20 April 2004, on the subject, there are a number of court decisions by both state and federal judiciaries that have held that, despite the divorce decree...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02561
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1SF recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to authorize Family Separation Allowance, Type II ($250 per month) as an exception to policy under the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, chapter 27, paragraph 270301D. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02562
AF/A1SF concurs with the applicant’s request; however, they are unable to provide the relief equitable to those members who traveled under the concurrent travel rules since the concurrent travel authorization initiated outside Air Force channels and no legal authority exists to make this a retroactive designation. At the time of the applicant’s relocation, Keesler AFB was designated as a “critical housing” area due to Hurricane Katrina. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 Jan 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02563
AF/A1SF concurs with the applicant’s request; however, they are unable to provide the relief equitable to those members who traveled under the concurrent travel rules since the concurrent travel authorization initiated outside Air Force channels and no legal authority exists to make this a retroactive designation. At the time of the applicant’s relocation, Keesler AFB was designated as a “critical housing” area due to Hurricane Katrina. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 Jan 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02564
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1SF recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to authorize Family Separation Allowance, Type II ($250 per month) as an exception to policy under the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, chapter 27, paragraph...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02565
AF/A1SF concurs with the applicant’s request; however, they are unable to provide the relief equitable to those members who traveled under the concurrent travel rules since the concurrent travel authorization initiated outside Air Force channels and no legal authority exists to make this a retroactive designation. At the time of the applicant’s relocation, Keesler AFB was designated as a “critical housing” area due to Hurricane Katrina. As of this date, this office has received no response...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02566
AF/A1SF concurs with the applicant’s request; however, they are unable to provide the relief equitable to those members who traveled under the concurrent travel rules since the concurrent travel authorization initiated outside Air Force channels and no legal authority exists to make this a retroactive designation. At the time of the applicant’s relocation, Keesler AFB was designated as a “critical housing” area due to Hurricane Katrina. As of this date, this office has received no response...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02567
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02567 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Jun 27, 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His permanent change of station (PCS) orders be amended to authorize him entitlements under “non-concurrent” travel rules. By relocating his family to Keesler (20 days after...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02568
AF/A1SF concurs with the applicant’s request; however, they are unable to provide the relief equitable to those members who traveled under the concurrent travel rules since the concurrent travel authorization initiated outside Air Force channels and no legal authority exists to make this a retroactive designation. At the time of the applicant’s relocation, Keesler AFB was designated as a “critical housing” area due to Hurricane Katrina. As of this date, this office has received no response...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02569
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1SF recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to authorize Family Separation Allowance, Type II ($250 per month) as an exception to policy under the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, chapter 27, paragraph...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02570
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1SF recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to authorize Family Separation Allowance, Type II ($250 per month) as an exception to policy under the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, chapter 27, paragraph...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02571
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1SF recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to authorize Family Separation Allowance, Type II ($250 per month) as an exception to policy under the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, chapter 27, paragraph 270301D. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02572
AF/A1SF concurs with the applicant’s request; however, they are unable to provide the relief equitable to those members who traveled under the concurrent travel rules since the concurrent travel authorization initiated outside Air Force channels and no legal authority exists to make this a retroactive designation. At the time of the applicant’s relocation, Keesler AFB was designated as a “critical housing” area due to Hurricane Katrina. As of this date, this office has received no response...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02573
AF/A1SF concurs with the applicant’s request; however, they are unable to provide the relief equitable to those members who traveled under the concurrent travel rules since the concurrent travel authorization initiated outside Air Force channels and no legal authority exists to make this a retroactive designation. At the time of the applicant’s relocation, Keesler AFB was designated as a “critical housing” area due to Hurricane Katrina. The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02574
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1SF recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to authorize Family Separation Allowance, Type II ($250 per month) as an exception to policy under the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, chapter 27, paragraph...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02597
The Air Force Informal Physical Evaluations Board’s (IPEB) determination that she be discharged from active service in the Air National Guard with a 20 percent disability was in error because the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), “[u]sing the same medical records and statements less than six months later,” rated her disability at 50 percent. The IPEB reviewed the request and determined that these two conditions, in and of themselves, are not unfitting conditions and therefore would not...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02604
The close-out date of the applicant’s report was 18 December 2005. AFPC/JA evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states he is requesting to have the “inappropriate sexual comments in the work place” and the comments regarding the LOA removed from his OPR. With respect to the applicant’s request regarding the derogatory comments on...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02606
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02606 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C,” “entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed. His adjustment disorder could have been the sole reason...