Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02455
Original file (BC-2006-02455.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-02455
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  19 FEBRUARY 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical conditions, Right  and  Left  Knee  Prosthesis
and Degenerative Arthritis of the Lumbar  Spine  be  reevaluated  under  the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program so  he  may  qualify  for
compensation under the CRSC program.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His medical conditions were aggravated by  injuries  incurred  when  he  was
involved in a helicopter accident in 1958.

In support of his request, applicant provides copies of his  special  orders
dated 26 August 1958, 8 September 1958 and  29 October  1958,  respectively.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 1 August 1968, after serving 20 years, 7 months, and  22  days  of  total
active service, the applicant was  medically  retired  due  to  his  medical
condition in the grade of technical sergeant.

On 9 August 2005, the applicant’s original request  for  CRSC  for  Prostate
Cancer,  Impaired  Hearing,  Erectile  Dysfunction   and   Special   Monthly
Compensation for Loss of Use of  a  Creative  Organ  was  approved  for  100
percent  disability.   His  request  for  CRSC  for  Right  and  Left   Knee
Prosthesis and Degenerative Arthritis of the Lumbar Spine  was  disapproved.


Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a  VA  Rating
Decision, dated 9 June 2005, with a combined compensable rating of 100%  for
his unfitting conditions.
_________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD advises there is no evidence  to  support
the applicant’s claim that his service-connected disabilities of  Right  and
Left Knee Prosthesis and Degenerative Arthritis of  the  Lumbar  Spine  were
aggravated by injuries sustained from a helicopter crash  and  were  combat-
related.  The DPPD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was sent to the applicant  on  1 December
2006 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  this  office
has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issue  involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2006-02455
in Executive Session on 17 May 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Mr. Alan Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence  pertaining  to  Docket  Number  BC-2006-
02455 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Aug 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 14 Nov 06.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Dec 06.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03134

    Original file (BC-2004-03134.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application and documentation extracted from his DVA records. He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 31 May 71, having served 23 years, 10 months, and 29 days on active duty. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01299

    Original file (BC-2005-01299.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01299 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of the knees, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01982

    Original file (BC-2004-01982.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01982 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Feb 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes mellitus, Meniere's syndrome, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, cervical spine and left knee, inflammation of the iris,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01275

    Original file (BC-2005-01275.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01275 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine and left knee condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02309

    Original file (BC-2004-02309.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the medical "red flags" and Combat Medical Readiness Training sessions the conditions under which they were conducted simulated war and required both mental and physical stress. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02767

    Original file (BC-2006-02767.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for compensation under the CRSC Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02490

    Original file (BC-2004-02490.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02490 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, knee prosthesis, degenerative arthritis and hip prosthesis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01992

    Original file (BC-2006-01992.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this letter, the doctor provides his opinion that the applicant’s back condition should be considered combat-related because “These complicated degenerative changes and neurological deficits are an occupational condition secondary to cumulative trauma over twenty years of flying, not from an isolated injury.” The doctor also stated that “applicant’s lumbar spine disease and neurological sequellae are based on a reasonable degree of medical certainty, causally related to flying airplanes...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02061

    Original file (BC-2004-02061.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 22 Mar 04 based upon the fact that evidence provided did not show his service-connected medical conditions were combat-related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01010

    Original file (BC-2006-01010.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states that while it is evident the applicant received significant treatment throughout his career for the injuries directly relating and secondary to the fall from the ladder, the evidence does not clearly support his contention that the fall was due to a combat related factor. SF 600, Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 27 December 2000, showed complaints of right hip pain. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...