RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02434
INDEX CODE: 112.10
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 MAY 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to permit his reentry
into the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
At the time he enlisted in the military, he was not physically prepared to
complete basic military training. His inadequate physical condition was
the result of poor preparation and not having maintained an active
lifestyle for some time prior to his enlistment. His condition was not due
to any physical disability or defect.
In support of his application, the applicant provides a personal statement
and a copy of an AFPC/DPPAE letter dated 29 August 2006.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 July 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age
of 20 in the grade of airman basic (E-1).
A Medical Board Report, dated 8 August 1995, indicates a Medical Evaluation
Board (MEB) diagnosed the applicant with Patellofemoral Arthralgia which
existed prior to service and interfered with basic military training. On
11 August 1995, his commander notified the applicant that he was being
recommended for discharge due to his failure to meet minimum medical
standards to join the Air Force. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the
notification and waived his rights to consult counsel and submit statements
in his own behalf. On 11 August 1995, the discharge authority approved the
applicant’s discharge under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208,
Chapter 5, Section C, Paragraph 5.14 and ATCR 39-6 with the type of
discharge being an entry level separation. The applicant was discharged
effective 16 August 1995 with an uncharacterized entry level separation, a
separation code of JFW (failed medical/physical procurement standards), and
a reentry code of 4C (failure to meet physical standards for enlistment).
He served 25 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPPRS states that
the applicant has not submitted any medical evidence supporting an
incorrect medical diagnosis by the MEB. To permit the applicant re-entry
without evidence to support that his medical condition no longer exists or
that his condition was diagnosed in error would place the applicant in a
position that could aggravate his condition during military service and
make the Air Force liable. The applicant must provide the Board documented
medical reports from military medical authorities before considering his
request.
The DPPRS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant submits two civilian medical evaluations from orthopedic
physicians indicating that he no longer suffers from the condition that
caused his separation from the service. He has become physically active
and maintains a strict fitness regimen consisting of running several miles
four days a week, weight training four days a week, and general fitness
activities two days a week. He is willing to appear for a formal hearing
or to travel to a military medical facility, chosen by the Board, if
deemed beneficial.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. After a thorough review of the
applicant’s submission and the evidence of record we are persuaded that
relief is warranted. We find no evidence to show that the applicant’s
discharge was erroneous or unjust; however, we note the applicant has
provided two medical evaluation letters from his civilian physicians
attesting to the fact that his physical condition is no longer deficient to
withstand the rigors of military service. Since the applicant will have to
pass a physical prior to his reentry into the military, we feel the
applicant should be afforded the opportunity of having a waiverable RE code
if the service is interested in his skills. Therefore, we recommend that
the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 16
August 1995, his RE code was 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 7 February 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-02434 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Aug 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 5 Dec 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 07.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 5 Dec 06, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-02434
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that at the time of
his discharge on 16 August 1995, his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code was
3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01155 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service, separation authority, separation code JFC, narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) 2C code be changed so that he may pursue a career in the military. The Air Force based this on the reported...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01127
His separation be changed to a medical discharge. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Apr 06, w/atchs. LAURENCE M. GRONER Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-01127 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03288
DPPAE states the applicant’s records were reviewed along with statements she submitted, and based on the circumstances of her discharge find no evidence or injustice. Therefore, the RE code is correct and she has not submitted any evidence nor documentation from medical authorities that the condition no longer exists. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02887
Based on the circumstances of his discharge, they found no evidence or injustice; therefore, applicant’s RE code is correct. HQ AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Nov 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02198
It appears that she is requesting administrative corrections be made to her medical records and discharge documents. She submitted a hardship letter requesting that she be assigned to a different location or separated so that she could later reenlist. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 03 for review...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01139
The reason for the action was that he received a medical narrative summary, dated 1 April 2002, which found that he did not meet minimum medical standards to enlist because of a history of recurrent shoulder dislocation and pain. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099
In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03674 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Based on the confirmatory results, the Board should direct correction of his RE code to 3K — Reserved for use by HQ Air Force Personnel Center or the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01428
On 19 November 2004, the applicant received notification from his commander that he was being recommended for discharge from the Air Force for conditions that interfere with military service. AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 May 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. The Board notes...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS stated that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in discharge processing. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...