RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02476
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: American Legion
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
be changed to delete Disability, Existed Prior to Service (EPTS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She had no disabilities prior to her service. Her entry exam will
show no disabilities existed when she joined the Air Force.
In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided a copy of her DD
Form 214 and an AF Form 618, Medical Board Report.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 February 2006. On
22 June 2006, while attending Basic Military Training (BMT) she was
referred to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) for stress
fractures in the right distal tibia/ankle as well as the right mid-
foot. The IPEB found her condition, existed prior to service, and was
incompatible with the rigors of military service. The IPEB opined her
stress fractures were due to a deconditioning which existed prior to
her entry on active duty. The IPEB recommended discharge under other
than Chapter 71, Title 10 United States Code (U.S.C.) Existed Prior To
Service (EPTS). On 29 June 2006, she concurred with the IPEB’s
findings and her Date of Separation (DOS) was changed to 5 July 2006.
She had served a total of 4 months and 22 days at the time of her
discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states the preponderance of the
evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the
disability process or at the time of her separation.
DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Counsel for the applicant responded to the Air Force evaluation
reiterating the applicant’s contention she had no disabilities prior
to enlisting in the Air Force and that the entry-level physical would
provide support for her contention. This injury happened in the
middle of her enlistment and prevented her from completing her first
term of service.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Information from her service medical
record reflects initially that her injury was not EPTS and was only
changed to reflect EPTS by the IPEB. As the Air Force presented no
conclusive evidence, and we are unable to find anything in the
evidence of record, to show that her injury while on active duty
merited a change from EPTS-No to EPTS-Yes, we believe any doubt in
this matter should be settled in favor of the applicant. The
separation program designator (SPD) code and the reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code she was assigned at her discharge are
significant impediments to her reenlistment eligibility. By
correcting her SPD and RE codes to Secretarial Authority, we are
giving her the opportunity to apply for a waiver if she desires to
reenlist. Should she decide to do so, whether or not she is
successful will depend on the needs of the military service concerned.
Our recommendation in no way provides a guarantee that she will be
allowed to return to any branch of the service. Accordingly, we
recommend that her records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 5 July 2006, she
was separated with under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2
(Secretarial Authority) with a separation program designator (SPD)
code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-02476 in Executive Session on 1 November 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 July 2006, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 26 September 2006.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 October 2006.
Exhibit E. Letter, APPLICANT, dated 17 October 2006.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2006-02476
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 5 July 2006,
she was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2
(Secretarial Authority) with a separation program designator (SPD)
code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03282
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant while in basic training began experiencing right ankle and lower extremity pain which interfered with her training. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily separated with an honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00406
Based on documentation in the file, they found the discharge consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states she knows there was no error or nothing in the form of an injustice, but still requests her records be corrected (Exhibit E). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01689
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01689 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to join the Armed Forces. In support of her request, the applicant submitted a personal statement, and a letter of...
Exhibit B. Exhibit I. Exhibit J.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01418 INDEX CODE 110.02 100.06 xxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: No xxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason on her DD Form 214 be changed from “Personality Disorder” to one that more accurately reflects her diagnosis and her military record reflect she is fit for military service. Since the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01418 INDEX CODE 110.02 100.06 xxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: No xxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason on her DD Form 214 be changed from “Personality Disorder” to one that more accurately reflects her diagnosis and her military record reflect she is fit for military service. Since the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02023 INDEX CODE: 110.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may enlist in the Air Force Reserves. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 8 Oct 02. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Oct 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00677
According to the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) report, Applicant was seen on 19 Jan 97 in the medical clinic for pain to his left knee. He was discharged on 1 May 97 with an RE code of “2Q.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of Applicant’s request. Applicant failed to provide supporting evidence that his left knee problem did not exist prior to his military service.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01998
Since his enlistment was considered fraudulent, his total active service was non-creditable. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. MICHAEL GALLOGLY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-01998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00309
On 16 April 2007, the applicant was notified by her commander that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for Chronic Sinusitis, which existed prior to service (EPTS). AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. AFPC/DPSOS's complete...