RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02377
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 FEBRUARY 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions discharge be changed to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He understood his discharge characterization would be upgraded after 10
years. He is in the process of completing a drug program and would like to
go back to school and get a degree as a counselor for drug and alcohol
dependency. He would like to attend the Veterans Affairs rehabilitation
program and change his life.
In support of his request, applicant provides a personal statement.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 12 January 1981, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a
period of 4 years. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman (E-
2).
On 22 April 1981, the applicant received an Article 15 for seven counts of
failure to go.
On 6 October 1981, after consulting military legal counsel, the applicant
requested he be discharged under AFM 39-12, para 2-78, for the good of the
service. The applicant admitted to the theft of a JVC portable stereo and
cassette recorder. On 20 November 1981, in accordance with AFM 39-12, the
commander initiated discharge proceedings against the applicant. In a
legal review of the discharge case file, the staff judge advocate found it
legally sufficient and recommended that the applicant be discharged from
the Air Force with a discharge under other than honorable conditions,
without the opportunity for probation and rehabilitation. On 9 December
1981, the discharge authority directed that the applicant be discharged
from the Air Force under the provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 2-78, for
the good of the service, with a type of discharge as under other than
honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged on 18 December 1981.
He served 11 months and 7 days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI provided a copy of an
Investigative Report, No. 234583W5, which is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that based
upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. DPPRS
further states that the applicant has not provided any new evidence or
identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge
processing.
The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was sent to the applicant on 9 February
2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response (See Exhibit E).
On 20 February 2007, a letter was forwarded to applicant suggesting that he
consider providing evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. On
22 February 2007, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant
for review and comment. On 12 March 2007, the FBI report was returned to
sender for reason of “Inmate Paroled.”
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of the
applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we see no
evidence that would warrant an upgrade of his characterization of service.
Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence that
would lead us to believe the actions taken to effect his discharge were
improper, or that the information in his discharge case file is erroneous.
In addition, in view of the contents of the FBI Identification Record we
are not persuaded the characterization of the applicant’s discharge
warrants an upgrade to honorable on the basis of clemency. In view of the
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
favorably consider his request.
4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our
understanding of the issue involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing
is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-02377
in Executive Session on 28 March 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2006-
02377 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Jul 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Identification Record Number 234583W5,
dated 9 Feb 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 31 Jan 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Feb 07.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 20 Feb 07, w/atch.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 22 Feb 07, w/atch.
JAY H. JORDAN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03919
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03919 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The discharge authority concurred with the recommendations and directed that he be discharged with...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03830
On 10 October 1978, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F. On 6 February 2007, a copy of the FBI Report of Investigation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 14 days (Exhibit G). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03782
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03782 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. On 1 February 2007, a copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01232
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01232 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd 11 May 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 14 May 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00767
At the time of the applicant’s discharge, AFM 39-12, Chap 2, paragraph 2-25, stated an airman discharged under this section should be furnished an Undesirable Discharge, unless the particular circumstances in a given case warrant a general or honorable discharge (Exhibit C). The discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing regulations and we find no evidence to indicate that his separation from the Air Force was inappropriate. Although the applicant did not specifically...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00295
DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and she provided no facts warranting an upgrade of her discharge. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 15 Feb 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03785
The applicant was discharged on 29 Mar 73. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence that would lead us to believe the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper, or that the information in his discharge case file is erroneous. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jan 07; AFBCMR dated 26 Jan 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00909
On 21 Mar 74, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment in the form of forfeiture of $50.00, 15 days of extra duty, and a reduction in grade from airman to airman basic suspended until 15 Sep 74, for disobeying a lawful order not to have visits of the opposite sex in dorm rooms from 2300 to 1000 hours, on or about 13 Mar 74. On 15 Oct 74, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment in the form of $100.00 forfeiture for disobeying a lawful order not to depart the team after lights out...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00044
The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was never notified of being discharged because he had opted for an early out. Applicants states he visited legal personnel concerning the issue of racism; however, he was told there was nothing that could be done and it was best if he just got out of the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00030
On 17 April 1972, the applicant’s commander forwarded the request to the group commander, recommending approval of the applicant’s request for discharge. He had served 1 year, 6 months and 17 days on active duty. The applicant has provided no evidence indicating the information in the discharge case file was erroneous, his substantial rights were violated, or that his commanders abused their discretionary authority.