RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02449
INDEX CODE: 111.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The duty title on the Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 10 June
2002 to 13 November 2002 be changed from MILITARY ASSISTANT TO
COMAIRSOUTH to MILITARY ASSISTANT TO COMAIRSOUTH/CHIEF, COMMAND
INTELLIGENCE.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The apparent oversight regarding his duty title on the OPR can be
attributed to many things including, a high ops tempo surrounding
September 11th, the ramp up of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), the
AIRSOUTH change of command, the ramp up for Operation Iraqi Freedom
(OIF), securing of replacements for his two positions and his
permanent change of station (PCS).
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of
pertinent OPR’s.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was appointed in the Regular Air Force on 26 September
1991. He was progressively promoted to the grade of major with a date
of rank (DOR) of 1 March 2002. He is currently serving in the Regular
Air Force in the grade of major and has over 15 years of service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAO recommends denial. DPPAO contends the applicant did not
provide sufficient documentation to justify the addition of the
requested duty title.
DPAO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
HQ AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial. DPPPEP states the rater is required
to enter the approved duty title as of the close out date of the OPR.
Only AFPC Assignments Branch has the authority to approve/disapprove
the duty information on officer personnel.
Air Force policy on correcting OPR’s is that an OPR is accurate as
written when the report becomes a matter of record. To effectively
challenge an OPR the applicant must provide clear evidence the EPR was
unjust or inaccurate and he must provide supporting documentation
signed by all the original evaluators on the report. He provided no
such documents.
DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
9 November 2006 for review and comment within 30 days of each letter.
As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant has failed to
provide clear evidence or support from his rating chain that the duty
title on his OPR for the period 10 June 2002 to 13 November 2002 is
inaccurate. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-02449 in Executive Session on 24 January 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I Hassan, Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Aug 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPAO, dated 18 Sep 06.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPEP, dated 1 Nov 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 06.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02412
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02412 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While there is no clear request listed by the applicant, it appears he wants his Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 14 November 2003 to 13 November 2004, section VI, Line 8 changed to read “Powered 1st AMC mission to Iran in 23...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00248
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was appointed a first lieutenant effective 17 May 01 and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on that same date. Therefore, she does not have the support of the rater. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03291
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial. DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states he is currently applying to have his EPR removed in accordance with AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02740
DPPPEP concedes there were numerous changes in reporting officials; however, no procedural errors were found in the reports on file in his master personnel record and, based on the information available, DPPPEP concludes there were no gaps in his records when he met the FY77B Temporary Captains Selection Board in July 1976. Officially, the record was in compliance with the governing regulations and no gaps existed when the record met the board. Further, DPPPO can find no gaps in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03010
AFI 36-2401 clearly states a report is not erroneous or unfair because an applicant believes it contributed to his nonselection. The complete HQ AFPC/DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends the advisory evaluation is inaccurate, misleading and mischaracterizes his request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02298
DPPPEP states that although the applicant may feel her evaluators have over stressed an isolated incident or a short period of time of substandard performance or conduct, the evaluators are obliged to consider such incidents, their significance, and the frequency with which they occurred in assessing performance and potential. As of this date, this office has received no response. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2007-02298 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01470
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01470 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Nov 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 10C0, “Operations Commander,” for the time he spent as a deputy group commander. According to information in the military personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03124
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03124 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 APRIL 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 475, Education/Training Report (TR), for the period 7 February 1997 through 19 December 1997 be replaced with a corrected TR. The applicant’s complete submission, with...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02962 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 March 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR), for the period 2 June 2005 through 13 December 2005 be replaced with the submitted OPR, which reflects his award of the 2005...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02524
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02524 INDEX NUMBER: 111.00, 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 MAR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 20 Mar 03 through 19 Mar 04, be removed from his records and he be considered for promotion to the...