RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02412
INDEX CODE:
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
While there is no clear request listed by the applicant, it appears he
wants his Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 14 November 2003 to
13 November 2004, section VI, Line 8 changed to read “Powered 1st AMC
mission to Iran in 23 years!”, rather than “Powered 1st AMC mission to
Iran in 13 years.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The AMC mission listed in the OPR in question was not the first
mission to Iran in 13 years. Air Material Command (AMC) was not stood
up until 1 June 1992. His was the first US military aircraft to
travel to Iran since the Desert One rescue attempt of 25 April 1980;
over 23 years, not 13 years.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of
articles from The Scotsman, the AMC Fact Sheet, and the 182nd Airlift
Wing Newsletter.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was appointed in the Regular Air Force on 26 September
1991. He was progressively promoted to the grade of major with a date
of rank (DOR) of 1 March 2002. He is currently serving in the Regular
Air Force in the grade of major and has over 15 years of service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial. DPPPEP contends the applicant does
not state what action he wants the AFBCMR to take. Other than
articles from those publications listed, he provided no other
supporting documentation or an explanation as to what should be, or
how the evaluation should be corrected. Applicant was given the
opportunity to submit further information on 6 September 2006 when HQ
AFPC/DPPPEP forwarded a request for additional information to the
applicant. He did not respond to the request within the allotted time
to do so
Air Force policy on correcting OPR’s is that an OPR is accurate as
written when the report becomes a matter of record. To effectively
challenge an OPR the applicant must provide clear evidence the EPR was
unjust or inaccurate and he must provide supporting documentation
signed by all the original evaluators on the report. He provided no
such documents.
DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9
November 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. We noted the applicant was offered an opportunity
to submit additional evidence. The officer performance report for the
period 14 November 2003 to 13 November 2004, section VI, line 8 was
inaccurate in reading Powered 1st AMC mission to Iran in 13 years
rather than 23 years. He has thus far failed to provide further
evidence to support his contention. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-02412 in Executive Session on 24 January 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I Hassan, Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Aug 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPEP, dated 1 Nov 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 06.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02449
DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 November 2006 for review and comment within 30 days of each letter. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00248
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was appointed a first lieutenant effective 17 May 01 and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on that same date. Therefore, she does not have the support of the rater. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03291
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial. DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states he is currently applying to have his EPR removed in accordance with AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02740
DPPPEP concedes there were numerous changes in reporting officials; however, no procedural errors were found in the reports on file in his master personnel record and, based on the information available, DPPPEP concludes there were no gaps in his records when he met the FY77B Temporary Captains Selection Board in July 1976. Officially, the record was in compliance with the governing regulations and no gaps existed when the record met the board. Further, DPPPO can find no gaps in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03010
AFI 36-2401 clearly states a report is not erroneous or unfair because an applicant believes it contributed to his nonselection. The complete HQ AFPC/DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends the advisory evaluation is inaccurate, misleading and mischaracterizes his request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02298
DPPPEP states that although the applicant may feel her evaluators have over stressed an isolated incident or a short period of time of substandard performance or conduct, the evaluators are obliged to consider such incidents, their significance, and the frequency with which they occurred in assessing performance and potential. As of this date, this office has received no response. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2007-02298 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02962 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 March 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR), for the period 2 June 2005 through 13 December 2005 be replaced with the submitted OPR, which reflects his award of the 2005...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03124
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03124 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 APRIL 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 475, Education/Training Report (TR), for the period 7 February 1997 through 19 December 1997 be replaced with a corrected TR. The applicant’s complete submission, with...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00212 INDEX CODE:114.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR), AF Form 707B, rendered for the period 7 April 1992 through 17 November 1992 be permanently removed from his official personnel records. After reviewing the documentation submitted, we are convinced...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02058-2
His record, to include a letter from the Commander, Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC/CC) to the President of the Special Selection Boards (SSBs) stating that, “All assignment, OER, OPR, PRF, PME and award documentations for the period “AFTER” Sep 1987 to 28 Feb 1998 are NOT available for administrative reasons which were the fault of the Air Force and not the member.”, be considered for promotion to the grade of brigadier general (O-7) by SSBs for the Calendar Years 1991 through 1997 boards...