AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03134
In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application and documentation extracted from his DVA records. He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 31 May 71, having served 23 years, 10 months, and 29 days on active duty. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03136
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states after a complete review of the applicant’s personnel records and the documentation he provided, they were unable to determine his eligibility for the BS and PH. On 12 January 2005, the Board staff informed the applicant’s wife that during the time period in question her late-husband’s military service falls under the purview of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03140
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03140 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was promoted to the grade of airman first class (A1C) after his graduation from Jet Aircraft and Engine Mechanics School. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03143
He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) effective and with a date of rank of 28 February 1991. JAJM notes the applicant is not contending that a specific error has occurred which requires the correction of his court-martial record and there is no indication in the record of such an error. Specifically, Section 1552(f)(1) permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by reviewing authorities under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03144
The law mandated that coverage for spouses [to include military-married- to-military couples (mil-mil couples)] and dependent children automatically go into effect on the date of implementation so long as the member was insured under the SGLI program, unless the member declined the coverage in writing. The Leave and Earnings Statements provided by the applicant reflect that no premiums were deducted for FSGLI coverage until August 2004. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Nov 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03145
When the applicant’s superior asked him what he said, he replied, “I refuse to work.” As a result, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 2 June 2004. After reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, the applicant’s discharge and separation codes appear to be in compliance with the governing AFI and we find no evidence to indicate his separation from the Air Force was inappropriate. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03156 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 APR 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, fracture of T-10 vertebrae, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03159
According to HQ AFPC/DPPAE (Exhibit C), effective 5 Mar 04, the Air Force reduced the reenlistment window from 12 months to three months prior to a member’s ETS. As the Air Force announces SRB changes, affected personnel are given at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the SRB changes to reenlist. Eligibility is based on the policies in effect at the time the member reenlists.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03160
There also was no decoration recommendation provided by the applicant or in his military records to indicate a SS recommendation was submitted. DPPPR states no individual can recommend himself or herself for a one- time reconsideration for decoration upgrade. As of this date, this office has received no response.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03161 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 Apr 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability discharge with severance pay on 19 Jun 00 be changed to a medical retirement. On 28 Mar 00, an IPEB diagnosed the applicant with the unfitting condition of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03162
On 7 March 2002, the applicant’s commander notified him that she was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208 for misconduct, specifically, commission of a serious offense. On 25 March 2002, a legal review of the discharge case file by the staff judge advocate found the file legally sufficient and recommended the applicant be discharged with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On 21 October 2002, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03167
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records reflect that he initially entered the Army on 15 January 1942 and served through 30 September 1943. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant's request for award of the PH Medal for injuries incurred in Italy by an accident, as opposed to wounds being sustained or caused by enemy actions...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03168
The applicant acknowledged if the request for discharge was approved he could receive an undesirable discharge under conditions other than honorable. The applicant submitted a request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his undesirable discharge upgraded to general. On 14 December 2004, the Board staff requested the applicant provide documentation regarding his post-service activities (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03170
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03170 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 APR 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03175
The procedures used to score the records ensure each panel member scores each record independently and fairly. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant discusses his knowledge of and past support of the Air Force promotion process in his duties as a first sergeant. In his appeal it appears the applicant seeks to indict the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03180
The commander recommended applicant receive a general (under honorable conditions) discharge based on failing his Career Development Course Examination on two different occasions. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03181
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03181 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for “Senior School Candidacy” (SIC) by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2003A (CY03A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board with the inclusion of his Officer Performance Report (OPR)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03186 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she declined Family Member Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) coverage and she be reimbursed for FSGLI premiums she paid from 1 November 2001 through 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03187
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF recommends denial. DPF explains AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, note below para 10.9.7, states, in part, a member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03190
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial and states consideration for the Major PV Selection Board is based on the receipt of the AF Form 709. The applicant’s senior rater, the sole nomination authority for the PV Selection Board, has not submitted documentation to support either an original nomination, or express support for the appeal request. The original packet was completed and submitted to the MPF on time.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03204
DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his traumatic arthritis, hypertension, and dermatophytosis are not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Nov 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03210
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03210 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Apr 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, scleredema adultorum (lupus), be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03212
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The period he spent in civilian confinement (26 January 2003 - 6 February 2003) should not be charged as lost time because no charges were ever filed against him after he was released. All performance ratings were an overall “5.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03214
On 16 October 2002, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling for being late for duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant’s medical records reflect he received medical intervention for alcohol abuse, adjustment disorder, depression, family maltreatment and personality disorder over a period of more than four years. The applicant’s records do not support a medical discharge for a...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03216
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS asserts that, based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the discretion of the discharge authority. As the applicant presents no facts warranting a change to her SPD code, denial is recommended. On 3 Feb 03, she requested discharge from active duty due to pregnancy and separated on 1 May 03...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03223
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicants enlisting as a prior service member must enlist at the grade held highest at their time of discharge, in this instance, the grade of E-1. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. John E. Pettit, Member Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Nov 04, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03225
He served 26 years, 6 months, and 27 days on active duty His CRSC application was disapproved on 6 Nov 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his ejection was in 1959, not 1968 as stated by DPPD. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03232
Members of the Board, Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Mr. Robert H. Altman, and Ms. Martha A. Maust considered this application on 15 February 2005. ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 20 Jan 05 AFBCMR BC-2004-03232 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03234
According to AFPC/DPF, no evidence was provided by the applicant showing he was denied leave, and he did not provide any proof his loss of leave was a result of an error or injustice by the Air Force. In their view, the applicant was given ample time between the time he made his intentions to separate known on 29 Jul 04 and when the assignment was changed to Peterson AFB on 16 Aug 04 to apply for separation and take leave prior to 1 Oct 04. As of this date, no response has been received by...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03238
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03238 INDEX CODE: A62.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 Apr 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The character of her service be upgraded to honorable by reason of a pre-existing medical condition. Erroneous enlistment is one that would not have occurred had the relevant facts been...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03245
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03245 INDEX CODE: 121.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The eight days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2004 be restored. Upon completion of her bed rest, she was required to return to her duty section in support of mission critical activities. MARTHA J. EVANS Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03246
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/JA also recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The applicant opines that since the withholding was a discretionary action, he believes it appropriate to discuss the necessity of the action taken by his commander in light of his exemplary record up to the time the action was taken. He states the discretionary action was not required by the circumstances.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03247
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair Attachment Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, dtd 3 Dec 04, w/Atch AFBCMR BC-2004-03247 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Competent authority approved his request...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03253
Counsel provides, among other documents, the Group History of HQ 40th Bombardment Group (40BG) recounting the Japanese air raid on 25 Dec 44; the applicant’s sworn affidavit; a 1982 statement from the flight surgeon assigned to the 25th Bombardment Squadron (25BS), 40BG, in India describing his treatment of the applicant’s knee injury; a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) advising the applicant’s service records could not be found and were likely lost in the 1973 fire;...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03256
Therefore, we have no basis to conclude that the corresponding RE code that was assigned at the time of his separation does not accurately reflect the circumstances of his separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03259
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the applicant’s records be changed to show permanent disability retirement for paranoid schizophrenia associated with psycho physiological low back pain rated at 30%. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03266
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03266 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 AUGUST 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show a promotion to the grade of second lieutenant (2LT). There is no indication that either the Pre- Flight Engineers Course or the Flight Engineer Class...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03269
On 3 Oct 69, his squadron commander notified him he was initiating action to discharge him from the Air Force. On 16 Oct 69, applicant’s legal counsel requested that the discharge authority withhold final action in the applicant’s case until he could prepare a rebuttal to the recommendation for discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03271
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 December 1984 in the grade of airman basic. He had not completed the program at the time of his discharge from active duty. The evidence of record indicates the applicant had been entered into the Alcohol Rehabilitation program and had not completed the program at the time of his separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03272
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 January 2005, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. After reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the findings and recommendation of the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03273
The remaining facts pertaining to the applicant’s medical issues are discussed in the advisory opinion provided by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial noting that during her enlistment medical examination, she completed a DD Form 2807, Report of Medical History. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03278
The applicant was disqualified from the electronics career field before completion of technical training and was reclassified in the AFSC 3C031 (computer communications) which at the time did not offer a bonus. The Board notes the applicant signed and initialed an enlistment agreement for payment of an $5,000.00 Initial Enlistment Bonus upon completion of technical training in the Air Force Specialty Code 2E131. He was disqualified from this career field before completion of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03289
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03289 INDEX CODE: A68.00 COUNSEL: GARY R. MYERS HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Apr 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general. He was discharged on 15 Apr 88 with a BCD. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit H. In another response, counsel...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03290
He received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant summarized the information contained in the applicant’s personnel and medical records and is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s record is warranted. Having found no error or injustice with regard...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03291
MARTHA J. EVANS Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPPOO, dtd 3 Dec 04 AFBCMR BC-2004-03291 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to show that: a. Competent authority approved his request for a Regular Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03298
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Enrollment in SBP was not offered to her husband after they were married. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states she can provide verification of her husband’s marital status at the time of his military separation. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. By letter dated 24 Dec 04, applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03302
The OSB originally prepared for that board contained the same spelling errors in the 1 Mar 00 and 1 Mar 01 duty titles that the applicant is now requesting be changed. A copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP), dated 2 Apr 04, for the applicant’s first appeal is at Exhibit C. On 24 May 04, the applicant was considered by SSB for the CY03A board, but was not selected for promotion to LTC. Regardless, the applicant has not persuaded us these minor errors were responsible for his nonselection...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03305
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPO provides an informational advisory without a recommendation, advising the applicant was considered but not selected by the CY93B major board. A complete copy of applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO provides a technical advisory confirming the applicant’s DOR to captain was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03306
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03306 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) be declared void and replaced with the reaccomplished PRF provided and he be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03310
On 12 Sep 96, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...