AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02367
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Staff Judge Advocate’s statement concerning his appeal of an Article 15 he received on 17 Jan 85 made reference to another airman who was being discharged at the same time and did not pertain to him. On 26 Feb 85, the office of the Staff Judge Advocate found no errors or irregularities in the discharge case file and recommended that the applicant be furnished a general discharge. On 5 Jun 87, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02375
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02375 INDEX CODE: 100.3, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 15 March 1996, the applicant was notified by his commander he was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02378
The only issue to be considered by the Board is his request for the SAEMR. His DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence in the applicant’s records to substantiate his request.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02386
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02386 INDEX NUMBER:136.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect that he completed over 20 years of active service. He remained on the TDRL until he was permanently retired for disability effective 14 Apr 71, with a disability rating of 80%. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389
His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02393
INDEX CODE: 136.01 BC-2003-02393 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02398
The applicant’s medical records indicate she began experiencing headaches during pregnancy but they markedly increased two months following her delivery in Nov 01. The IPEB concluded her headaches were unfitting for continued military services, rated the headaches at 10%, and recommended discharge with severance pay. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02405
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02405 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given the required years of service to qualify for the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefit. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02411
Due to the severity of the applicant’s condition, his dermatologist initiated a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states psoriasis or a verified history of psoriasis is disqualifying for entry in military service. The applicant’s history of skin problems during basic training and the references to skin disease prior to his entry on active duty is consistent with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02423
The 139-day tour entitles the applicant to BAH-II and the 179-day tour entitles the applicant to BAH-I. However, if a member receives an order modification or extension of assignment, the prospective (new) period of active duty must be 140 days or more and BAH-I would start on the date of modification.” DPPI states the waiver was not approved prior to the 139-day point, nor was there an administrative oversight in cutting the orders causing a delay. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02427
On 3 Jun 82, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge to general or honorable. On 30 Aug 82, a similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board (see Record of Proceedings at Exhibit C). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit E. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In the applicant’s response to the evaluation,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02431
The ADB recommended the applicant be discharged from the USAFR with an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPP asserts that the ADB is responsible for determining character of service for the discharge action; however, it is not the authority for determining the highest grade satisfactorily held for the purpose of retirement. A complete copy of counsel’s response is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02436
The DVA has not determined his headaches to be presumptive of Gulf War service. The fact that a member incurred a disability during a period of war or an area of armed conflict or while participating in combat operations is not sufficient to support a combat-related determination. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the direct result of armed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02439
Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10, United States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that same title. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02443
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02443 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entry-level separation be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 25 Jun 02, applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation, by reason of “Entry Level Performance and Conduct,” and was issued an RE code of 2C...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02449
On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02464
The applicant’s medical records reveal the following: A narrative summary prepared for an Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) in January 2000, indicated the applicant was diagnosed with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with poor control on medical therapy, depression - stable by history. She would still be an active duty member of the Air Force had she not been medically discharged for a condition (supraventricular tachycardia) she was told was too severe to remain on active duty and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02466
In support of his request applicant provided documents extracted from his medical records. There is no evidence of duty related back injury in the remaining medical documentation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02467A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02467 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable based on clemency. On 3 September 2003, the applicant’s request for his undesirable discharge be upgrade to honorable was considered and denied by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02469
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that although he contends he provided medical information for the three years up to the time of his enlistment, there is no evidence to confirm this. The Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and states they concur with the Medical Consultant’s evaluation and recommend no...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02471
His CRSC application was disapproved on 11 Jul 03 based upon the preponderance of evidence that none of his service-connected conditions were determined to be combat-related _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states nothing in his medical records reflects he was exposed to Agent Orange. Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 30 Jul 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02497
At the time of his enlistment processing he was not made aware that a CLRP enrollment statement must be included with his contract to be eligible for the program. After reviewing the evidence of record, we do believe the applicant has been the victim of an injustice. ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-02497 INDEX CODE: 128.14 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02499
The requested time is documented on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, from his enlistment with the USMC. DPPI states that since the applicant voluntarily enlisted with NavRes, on 29 March 1990, at a lower grade (E-3), and, because he did not qualify for enlistment with the FL ANG as an E-6, he is not entitled to count the time spent in the USMC as an E-6. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02505
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a counsel’s brief, copies of the LOR, OPR, Propriety of Promotion Action, and other documents associated with the matter under review. On 7 Jan 02, the Deputy Secretary of Defense recommended the applicant’s name be removed from the FY00 Lieutenant Colonel Promotion List, indicating the applicant had refused to undergo an anthrax immunization and had advised members of the squadron to refuse their anthrax inoculations. Counsel’s complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02515
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered active duty as a second lieutenant, Army of the United States, on 29 Apr 43. In reviewing the applicant’s record and all applicable regulations in regard to POW promotions, they find no documentation to support the applicant’s promotion to captain. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02516
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not reflect the medal for the time he served in Saudi Arabia or that he contributed in the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program. In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; a copy of DD Form 2366, Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984, dated 11 Jan 96; a copy of Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 18 Apr 98; DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02518
Due to flying deficiencies, he was relieved from further flying and entered bombardier school. He cannot show medical documentation because the Air Force has his medical records. We took notice of the applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained while on bombing missions in Europe.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02519
The applicant was advised by AFPC in a letter dated 26 September 1983, that an RCSBP application had not been received at their headquarters from her spouse and there was no RCSBP coverage in effect. If the decision is to grant the relief sought, the servicemember’s record should be corrected to show he elected full, immediate coverage for his spouse (Option C), based on full-retired pay under the RCSBP, effective 20 December 1983. As a consequence, the applicant was advised by AFPC on 26...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02532
His next entry for back pain was on 21 Mar 85 when he sought care for low back pain incurred while lifting a manhole cover. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02535
A performance feedback worksheet with all items marked “needs little or no improvement” means the ratee is meeting the rater’s standard at the time. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPEP evaluated the impact of the contested EPR on the applicant’s previous promotion considerations. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response to the Air Force evaluation,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02547
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was discharged on 2 Jan 75, after 8 months and 22 days on active duty. Therefore, her DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, does not list character and behavior disorder, personality disorder, or antisocial personality disorder as the basis for discharge. The applicant argues that the diagnosis of “Anti-Social Personality Disorder”...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02553
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. c. Is entitled to retired pay, notwithstanding that such retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02555
There is no indication in the veteran’s records of the result of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The VA examined the veteran shortly after his discharge and on 20 October 1945 informed him his “alleged disability of Injury to Left Thigh was not shown on the last examination.” The veteran did receive VA compensation however, for contracting malaria during “war service.” Although the Report of Separation reflects he received a wound on 23 March 1945, the veteran, not his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02576
On 20 Feb 04, applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected/reissued reflecting the narrative reason for separation (Item 28) as “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant stated that the applicant was not discharged due to her ovarian cyst (although recurrent disabling pain due to this condition is disqualifying for entry). At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, they...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02577
While it is noted the EPR for the period ending 3 June 1996 indicates he was deployed during Operation Southern Watch, for which the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was awarded, we believe that based on the time period he was deployed, it would appear he was deployed initially in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm thereby making him eligible for the SWASM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02579
There is a document that shows a 12-month tour in Vietnam from 28 August 1971 to 24 August 1972, however, the document is dated four years after the applicant was released from active duty. The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 5 March 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. There is a document which shows a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02582
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02582 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). On 26 August 2003, AFPC/DPPPR informed the applicant that the 23rd TFW was awarded the AFOUA for the period 1 April 1989 to 31 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02585
She contends other personnel were involved but only she received a letter of reprimand (LOR) and was placed on the commander’s control roster. She responded with a letter to her squadron commander and eight character references - some of which provided insight on how she had been treated by her immediate supervisor. Letter of appeal to her commander.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02590
INDEX CODE: 131.01 BC-2003-02590 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02599
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02599 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air National Guard (ANG) service be combined with his active service to qualify for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02606
Prior to his involuntary cross training into weapons control, he had been either Airmen of the Year or NCO of the Year at every base where he was assigned. The Air Force is requesting recoupment of $411.96 for the enlistment they should have removed from his records. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02607
In support of her application, the applicant provided a personal statement. Since the applicant declined coverage effective 31 May 2003, and coverage was terminated, it is our opinion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld for the preceding months. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02615
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-02615 INDEX CODE 112.07 112.05 COUNSEL: J. Byron Halcomb HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 26 Feb 65 release from active duty from the Air Force be changed so that he would have four years of total active service. According to the Statement of Service (SOS) for Naval Reserve Retirement, dated 7...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02619
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02619 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The requirement of 20 years of service be waived so that he may be eligible for the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program. ___________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02623
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02623 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Silver Star Medal and the Purple Heart Medal. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was recommended for the Silver Star Medal (SSM) for actions on 8 April 1945, but it...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02637
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02637 INDEX CODE: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) prepared for the Calendar Year 2003A (CY03A) Central Major Selection Board be corrected to include his Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period 17 May 2002 through 1 April 2003...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02641
He kept the Air Force informed and fulfilled every aspect of his HPSP contract that the Air Force allowed. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that the statement by the Medical Consultant is false. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02642 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given constructive credit for eight months of service and allowed to retire from the Air Force. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02643
INDEX CODE: 128.00 BC-2003-02643 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Applicant Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...