RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02449
INDEX CODE: 128.14
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group
Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of May 2003.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to her Permanent Change of Station (PCS) to Korea, she was not informed
that she had to submit a declination in writing to decline FSGLI. Even
though coverage apparently started on 1 November 2001, she did not receive
any deductions for FSGLI premiums until her husband retired from the
military in April 2003. In May 2003, she received a debt of $360 for FSGLI
premiums retroactive to November 2001. Had premiums been deducted
appropriately when the coverage began, she would have declined it
immediately. She submitted the proper documentation to opt out of FSGLI
coverage in June 2003; however, she feels she should be reimbursed for the
debt that was collected.
In support of her application, the applicant submits a personal statement
to AFPC/DPW; a copy of her FSGLI declination dated 13 June 2003; copies of
her Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) for May, June and July 2003; her
spouse’s retirement orders; and her PCS orders to Korea. The applicant’s
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the rank of master
sergeant (E-7). Her Total Active Federal Military Service Date is 20
August 1984.
On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A,
Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement
dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI
premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. The debt was
collected at $120 per month from May - July 2003. The applicant’s also
incurred a deduction of $20 per month for FSGLI premiums in the months of
May and June 2003.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPW recommends the applicant’s request be denied. It is DPW’s opinion
that Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of the
new FSGLI program and that the applicant had adequate time to make an
election decision. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although
premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was
insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.
Had her spouse become a fatality during this period, the proceeds of the
$100,000 coverage would have been paid to the applicant in accordance with
38 United States Code 1970. The DPW evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21
November 2003, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting reimbursement for the
applicant’s Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums
deducted from her pay. The applicant indicates that she was not notified
of the automatic coverage. However, we note that the Air Force provided
information in advance of the FSGLI program implementation by adding
comments in the remarks section of every member’s Leave and Earnings
Statement (LES). In addition, the Air Force office of primary
responsibility advises that the applicant’s unit took extensive measures to
announce the program changes and it was the applicant’s responsibility to
make a new election or to refuse these benefits. We also note that the
applicant’s spouse was covered for the period 1 November 2001 through 30
June 2003, even though there was a delay in premium deductions. Had the
applicant’s spouse become a fatality during this period, the proceeds of
the $100,000 coverage would have been paid to her. In view of the
foregoing, we believe that Air Force authorities made every reasonable
effort to notify the applicant of the requirements set forth in Public Laws
106-419 and 107-14 and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums
withheld. Therefore, we do not recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 20 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chairman
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein Jr., Member
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2003-02449:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jul 03, with attachments.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 13 Nov 03, w/ atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Nov 03.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01474
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 2 December 2003, the applicant completed an SGLV 8286A declining FSGLI coverage. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000.00 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 December 2003.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00134
They indicated Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time to make an election decision. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 to present. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03709
Apparently, Mountain Home AFB had failed to enter a code in their records to show joint spouse and exemption from SGLI spouse coverage. There is no declination statement in the member’s record. No premiums were deducted from her pay until she arrived at Laughlin AFB in September 2002.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02974
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated despite what the OTS personnel stated she had provided the Board with only information she was given regarding the SGLI program. She states that had she seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted from her pay, she would have taken action to decline coverage. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02783
The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse or child(ren), unless the member declined coverage. Although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 - 30 June 2003. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00230
The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage prior to 31 December 2001. In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 July 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02747
They indicated that Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and that the applicant had adequate time prior to his deployment to make an election decision. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from his pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 May 2003. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00229
The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage prior to 31 December 2001. In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 July 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00179
We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00179 in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665
On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...