Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02582
Original file (BC-2003-02582.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02582
                       INDEX CODE:  107.00
                       COUNSEL:  None

                       HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding
Unit Award (AFOUA).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served with the 23rd Tactical Fighter Wing (TFW)  at  England  AFB,
Louisiana from July 1990 to January 1992.  The AFOUA  was  awarded  to
the 23rd TFW for the period April 1989 to March 1991.

Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 February 1990  as
an airman basic for a period of four years.

His DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon,
National Defense Service Medal and no foreign service.

On 26 August 2003, AFPC/DPPPR informed the applicant that the 23rd TFW
was awarded the AFOUA for the period 1 April 1989  to  31 March  1991;
however, his records reflect that his unit of assignment was the  23rd
Communications Squadron (CS).  The 23rd CS was awarded the  AFOUA  for
the period 4 June 1992 to 22 February 1993.  They further informed him
that he was not eligible to share in the unit’s award because  it  was
awarded after he separated from active duty.   He  was  also  informed
that parent and subordinate  units  do  not  share  each  others  unit
awards.  AFPC/DPPPR requested the applicant withdraw his request.  The
applicant did not respond.

Applicant was honorably discharged on 27 January 1992, with  severance
pay with a disability rating of 20 percent.   He  served  1  year,  11
months and 19 days of active service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant has not provided any  documentation
to support his request.  The applicant was not assigned  to  the  23rd
TFW and is not eligible for any unit awards earned by that unit.   The
23rd CS did earn the AFOUA, but not during the  period  the  applicant
was assigned to the unit.  Therefore, the applicant’s DD Form  214  is
correct and he is not eligible for any additional unit  or  individual
awards or decorations.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
21 November 2003, for review  and  response.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of  the  Air
Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our  conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or  an  injustice.
The applicant contends his unit was awarded the AFOUA for  the  period
April 1989 to March  1991.   The  evidence  of  record  indicates  the
applicant's parent unit was awarded the AFOUA for the  period  1 April
1989 to 31 March 1991, however, there is no evidence  the  applicant's
assigned unit was  eligible  for  the  award  for  that  time  period.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of  material error or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-02582 in  Executive  Session  on  10  February  2004,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
                       Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
                       Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Jul 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 17 Nov 03, w/atch.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Nov 03.




                                  ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
                                  Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02737

    Original file (BC-2002-02737.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02737 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and one oak leaf cluster (OLC) to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and Air Force Organizational...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03882

    Original file (BC-2003-03882.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03882 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the addition of the “V” device to his Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04351

    Original file (BC-2010-04351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 January 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR wrote the applicant stating they were able to verify his entitlement for award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star and the RVNGC w/P while serving with the 366th Munitions Maintenance Squadron, Takhli Air Base, Thailand, from 24 August 1972 to 4 October 1972; and, that his record would be corrected to reflect these awards. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03032

    Original file (BC-2006-03032.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, as of this date, no response has been received by this office. Partial relief was granted when he was administratively awarded those individual and unit awards for which he was eligible; however, there is no evidence that applicant performed in-place consecutive overseas tours in order to be eligible for award of another AFOR. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-03032 in Executive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03042

    Original file (BC-2003-03042.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A revision to AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Awards and Decorations Program, reduced the time requirement from 36 months to 24 months for award of the Combat Readiness Medal. In 1994, the criteria for award of the CRM changed from 36 months to 24 months of duty while assigned to a unit designated by a Major Command (MAJCOM) as a combat ready unit. The applicant has not provided any evidence to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00896

    Original file (BC-2007-00896.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant’s records do not indicate that he was eligible for award of the RVNCM, that his unit was awarded the RVNGC w/P, or that he was ever assigned/attached to the 8th TFW...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02206

    Original file (BC-2003-02206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02206 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the AFCM on or near the last day of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03504

    Original file (bc-2003-03504.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03504 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with palm device, and the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Military Education (PME) Graduate ribbon. We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01583

    Original file (BC-2003-01583.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Jun 03, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that he was not eligible for the AFOLTR because the award was not established until 12 Oct 80, after his separation from the Air Force on 9 Jan 80. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial because the applicant is not eligible for the AFOLTR, which is awarded only to service members who completed an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. After a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03191

    Original file (BC-2003-03191.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the applicant was discharged on 6 November 1945, he is not eligible for the CAR. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant and his counsel on 6 February 2004 for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...