RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02532
INDEX CODE: 108.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical conditions, lumbosacral strain with herniated
disc disease at L5-S1 and chronic right shoulder impingement syndrome, be
assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His conditions were the result of an injury he incurred while lifting a
manhole cover during an Alert exercise at Bitburg AB, Germany. From that
instant he has suffered constant back and shoulder pain. An MRI was not
done until years later and it was then discovered that his pain was more
than sore muscles. Everything that was done at Bitburg was in preparation
for war with the Soviets. His complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 1
Nov 68. He was progressively promoted to the grade of technical sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Feb 87.
He served as a Combat Control Helper, as an Aircraft Control and Warning
Systems Technician, and a Cable Splicing Specialist. He voluntarily
retired from the Air Force for years of service on 1 Feb 89, having served
20 years and 3 months on active duty.
Current Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined
compensable rating of 60% for his unfitting conditions.
His CRSC application was disapproved on 11 Jul 03 based upon the fact that
none of his service-connected medical conditions were determined to be
combat-related or received during simulated war conditions/exercises.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states although he as treated for
various medical conditions throughout his career, nothing reflects his
service-connected conditions were the direct result of an armed conflict or
caused by an instrumentality of war. The fact that a member may incur a
medical condition during a period of war or while performing combat
operations is not sufficient evidence to support a combat-related
determination. Military records must show a definite causal relationship
between the armed conflict and the medical condition. A review of his
records failed to show a combat-related connection for his service-
connected injury. His contention that he hurt his back while opening a
simulated destroyed manhole has no direct causal connection to combat
activity. It is an injury resulting from heavy manual labor. His
retirement physical shows he was qualified for worldwide duty with no
disqualifying physical profiles.
The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reiterates that he was injured while participating in an Alert at
Bitburg. The DVA determined that he suffered with chronic debilitating
pain from the instant he was injured and that the injury precipitated his
current condition. If an MRI had been done after his initial injury, it
would have been known then that he had damaged discs and not lumbosacral
strain or muscle strain. With the improper diagnosis, his supervisor would
not let him off work. He had no choice but to work no matter how much pain
he was in. It was not until his collapse in 1996 that the correct
diagnosis was made.
In support of his response, applicant provided a personal statement,
letters from his spouse and child, and a document extracted from his
medical record. His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant
states in September 1982, he sought care for mid low back pain after
digging. His next entry for back pain was on 21 Mar 85 when he sought care
for low back pain incurred while lifting a manhole cover. He was diagnosed
with lumbar strain and appropriately treated with rest, medication, and
physical therapy. On 11 Apr 85, he sought care for twisting his back two
days earlier. No details of the mechanism of the injury are evident.
There are no further service medical record entries for back pain. In
October 1983, he sought care for right shoulder pain that began without any
evidence of any trauma or strain. He was diagnosed with rotator cuff
tendonitis.
There is no evidence he incurred an injury during conditions simulating war
that directly and solely led to his back disease. He experienced recurrent
mild back strains while on active duty and continued to experience these in
the years following his retirement. His duties on active duty are not
classified as hazardous. The occurrence of his reported back strain does
not differ from those incurred under similar circumstances in non-combat or
similar civilian pursuits.
The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit F.
ODUSD(MPP)/Comp reviewed the applicant's request and concurs with the
findings and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant. The ODUSD
evaluation is at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the additional Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 30 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in
the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for compensation
under the CRSC Act. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the
Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
02532 in Executive Session on 6 Oct 04, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 03, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 22 Sep 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Oct 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 10 Oct 03, w/atchs
Exhibit F. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 3 Dec 03.
Exhibit G. Letter, ODUSD(MPP)/Comp, dated 21 Jul 04.
Exhibit H. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 30 Jul 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02466
In support of his request applicant provided documents extracted from his medical records. There is no evidence of duty related back injury in the remaining medical documentation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03911
A review of his medical records failed to show that his back injury was sustained on 12 Nov 65 as a result of a missile motor slipping its cradle during assembly in support of combat training missions. The Medical Consultant states a single medical record entry indicates he presented for lumbosacral back pain on 12 Nov 65 but no mechanism of injury is documented and there are no work-site accident or injury reports present in the records that may provide additional information. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02824
Before he ruptured the disc in his lower back he did not have any serious back problems. The Medical Consultant states the applicant's medical records contain an entry dated 13 Nov 70 for low back pain incurred lifting an 80 lb. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02830
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02830 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All of his service-connected medical conditions be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. There are no service medical record entries for injuries...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03103
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The fact that a member may incur a medical condition during a period of war or while performing combat operations is not sufficient evidence to support a combat-related determination. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 20 Jan 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02874
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His medical records do not correctly reflect his injuries received while he was in Vietnam. In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation extracted from his medical records. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02963
The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states he was supporting the war directly and indirectly when he incurred his injury. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03642
The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit E. ODUSD(MPP)/Comp reviewed the applicant's request and concurs with the findings and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00236
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00236 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, back strain, spinal disc condition, and hemorrhoids, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. On 10 Jul...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02341
The Medical Consultant states a review of his service medical records finds no evidence of trauma, injuries, or exposures related to combat, during exercises or training simulating combat, or attributed to an instrumentality of war. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,...