RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to
enlist in the Air National Guard.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His last year in the service was critical and hectic for him. He and
his supervisor were not getting along and it seems he was being
harshly punished for every small mistake he made. His supervisor was
deployed during the time she was preparing his Enlisted Performance
Report (EPR). He heard his supervisor was getting a divorce and it
seems like the weight was being put on him. He received a two rating
on his EPR. His assignment to Korea and his reenlistment were denied.
His career was at the end of its excitement. He had an EPR coming up
but he did not have the patience to wait for it and requested terminal
leave because his journey ahead was gone.
He further states he accepts full responsibility for his actions
during this year and hopes he is given another chance.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 May 1998 for a
period of four years as an airman basic.
The applicant’s records indicate he received a Letter of Reprimand
(LOR) for pulling the fire alarm in the dining hall in February 2001
as a prank. He received four letters of counseling for dereliction of
duty and failure to show. The applicant
received another LOR in January 2002 for his inability to perform his
duty and a Unfavorable Information File was established. The
applicant received a two rating on his Enlisted Performance Report
(EPR) for the period ending 19 January 2002.
The applicant was denied reenlistment on 19 July 2002. The basis for
the denial of reenlistment was the applicant’s inability to conform to
military standards and environment. He appealed the nonselection on
16 October 2002. The appeal was denied on 7 November 2002.
The applicant was discharged on 19 February 2003, in the grade of
senior airman with an honorable discharge. He served four years and
nine months of active duty service. He received an RE code of “2X”
which indicates the applicant was a first-term, second-term, or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) and a Separation Program
Designator (SPD) code of “JBK” which indicates the servicemember was
separated after completion of required active service (Denied
reenlistment).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the applicant’s separation code was
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation. Also, the separation was within the sound
discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant’s separation
code and narrative reason for separation are correct. Furthermore,
the applicant has provided no evidence or identified any errors or
injustices that may have occurred during the discharge process, nor
has he provided evidence to warrant a change in his reason for
discharge. They recommend the applicant’s request be denied.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility
code of "2X," indicating the servicemember was a First-term, second-
term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment
under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP), which is correct.
AFPC/DPPAE further states the applicant has not provided any
documentation to support his request. Furthermore, the waivers of RE
codes for enlistment are considered and approved based on the needs of
the military service and recruiting initiatives at the time of the
enlistment inquiry (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
21 November 2003, for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions are
duly noted; however, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been
the victim of an error or injustice. At the time members are
separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated
upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their
separation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we
believe that given the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s
separation, the RE code issued was in accordance with the appropriate
directives. Therefore, we find no basis upon which to recommend
favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-02616 in Executive Session on 13 January 2004, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Member
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Jul 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 3 Sep 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Nov 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Nov 03.
CHARLENE BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02219
Applicant’s military personnel records reveal that, on 8 March 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (completion of active required service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR states the applicant’s service dates and date of rank to the grade of E-4 are correct. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01262
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 August 1994, for a period of four years in the grade of airman first class (E-3). The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his assigned RE code is in error or contrary to the prevailing instruction. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01027 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to allow reenlistment. Prior to 16 October 1998, his denial of reenlistment,...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03340
The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that the commander’s decision to deny him reenlistment was inappropriate or not in compliance with Air Force policy. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02091
On 24 Jun 04, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service), and furnished an RE code of 2X (First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, after a review of his military...