RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01795
INDEX NUMBER: 111.02
XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The enlisted performance report (EPR) rendered on him for the period
19 Jan 98 to 11 Oct 99 be revised to reflect ratings to the far right
in all performance factors under Section III, “Evaluation of
Performance” and in Section IV, “Promotion Recommendation” or, in the
alternative, the report be voided and removed from his record.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The contested EPR is the lowest rated duty performance he has received
in 28 years of total military service.
He received conflicting accounts from his immediate rater and his
rater’s rater as to why he received the poor rating.
The rating on his EPR conflicts with the overall excellent rating he
received on his civilian appraisal.
He was never counseled by anyone in his rating chain for unacceptable
performance.
In support of his appeal the applicant has provided copies of his
military record of performance and a copy of his civilian performance
appraisal covering the same period.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to information provided by HQ ARPC, the Evaluation Reports
Appeal Board (ERAB) reviewed the applicant’s appeal package and
determined that his requests should be denied. Based on copies
submitted by the applicant, a resume of his performance reports
follows:
Closeout Date Overall Rating
6 Feb 85 9 (APR system)
6 Feb 86 9
3 Jan 87 9
22 Oct 88 9
27 Feb 90 5 (EPR system)
18 Jan 98 5
*11 Oct 99 3
11 Oct 01 5
* Contested Report
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPBR2 recommends denial of the applicant’s requests. The ERAB
considered and denied a request to remove the contested EPR from the
applicant’s records. The applicant failed to provide enough
documentation substantiating his allegations in accordance with
required directives.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ ARPC/DPB recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The
applicant has not exhausted administrative avenues available to him.
As a courtesy, they submitted the applicant’s package to the ERAB for
their consideration. Regarding the applicant’s assertion that his
reports written before and after the contested report were marked
higher, they indicate that each reporting period is separate and
unique and that any report rendered before or after a particular
report has no bearing on that report. They also indicate that a
member’s civilian rating carries no weight when evaluated for their
military job.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
4 Jun 03 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response
has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, a majority of the Board agrees with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility
and adopts their rationale as the basis for their conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, a majority
of the Board finds no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-
01795 in Executive Session on 16 July 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to deny applicant’s request.
Mr. Gallogly voted to grant the applicant’s request but did not
desire to submit a minority report. The following documentary
evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 May 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPBR2, dated 29 May 03.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, ARPC/DPB, dated 2 Jun 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 03.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
(AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX
I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members. A majority found that applicant
had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and
recommended the case be denied. I concur with that finding and their
conclusion that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their
recommendation that the application be denied.
Please advise the applicant accordingly.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01900
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The report does not reflect his efforts or accomplishments during the rating period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPB recommends...
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Enlisted Performance Report, AF Form 910, rendered for the period 24 July 1997 through 11 December 1998, be declared void and removed from her records. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01041 MEMORANDUM...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01623
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his EPR closing 8 Jun 02; a computer printout (Ratee’s Initial/Follow-up Performance Feedback Notification), dated 11 Jun 01; a Report on Individual Personnel (RIP), dated 14 Feb 02; a Records Review Rip, dated 24 Jul 02; a copy of a CRO/Duty Title Worksheet; copies of his AF Forms 932, Performance Feedback Worksheet (MSgt thru CMSgt), dated 2 Jan 02 and 19 Feb 02, respectively, and a copy of emails from the Base IMA Administrator...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02202
On 20 July 2005, ARPC/DPBPP, requested the applicant provide a copy of the additional rater’s e-mail, dated 10 July 2003, which the applicant’s cites as an attachment in her Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records application package. We note the comments provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility that although Air Force policy does require performance feedback for personnel, it does not replace day-to-day feedback; and, failure to conduct a required or requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03068
The applicant’s nomination package for the FY06 LTC PV Selection Board was received by HQ ARPC on 29 Apr 05. Review of the nomination package determined the applicant did not meet one of the criteria for PV consideration, i.e., having at least 50 credit points for a year of satisfactory federal service during the last full R/R year. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01693
For airmen who meet eligibility requirements, the immediate supervisor recommends promotion on AF Form 224, Recommendation and Authorization for Promotion of Airman as Reserve of the Air Force. According to the 7 Apr 04 report, MSgt C was the rater and Chief A was the additional rater. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He should have received an initial and...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00237
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an unfair and unjust rating without any documentation and there was no feedback during or before 4 Feb 07 through 3 Feb 08. The Evaluations Reports Appeals Board (ERAB) denied his appeal of the contested report. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
After thoroughly reviewing the documentation submitted with this appeal, we are not persuaded that the contested report is an inaccurate assessment of the applicant's performance during the contested time period. The applicant asserts that there was insufficient supervision under the rater and additional rater for an Evaluation Performance Report (EPR) to be rendered; however, the Board finds insufficient documentation to support this contention. Exhibit F. Letter, Addendum to Report of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00791
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) did not reach the Selection Board Secretariat in time to be considered for promotion by the U0405A board. The applicant provided a letter from his senior rater dated 2 Feb 04 explaining why the PRF was prepared and submitted late. We find no evidence of an error in this case and after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission, we do not believe he has...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01263
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01263 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 OCT 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by a special selection board (SSB) for the FY05 Colonel Line and NonLine Promotion Board with his Officer...