Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03982-02
Original file (03982-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Y

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 3982-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

N130D1/02U0442 of 12 August 2002, a copy of

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
2000  NAVY PENTAGO
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

N

0

Y

S

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

IN THE CASE

OF-

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#03982-02  with microfiche service record

1.

The following provides comment and recommendation on

petition.

N130  recommends denial of

3
inlistment  Bonus  

(EB).

petition for an

3.
thr
volunteered for the Advanced Electronics Field  
Electronics Computer Field Program Guarantee.

/ Advanced
In her petition,
requests favorable action that would allow payment

is a Navy Veteran who enlisted in the Navy
d Entry Program (DEP) on   18 September  2001  and

of an EB.

EB is not an entitlement,

but a recruiting tool used at the
4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
The EB program is budgeted based on
quotas provided by the Commander,
Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of
accession seats.
EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4.

 
does not have an EB contract in her service record and

Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB.

Navy Recruiting Command and the

therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  “A” School

B

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

6.
herewith as enclosure (1).

listed Bonus

Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02895-02

    Original file (02895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00952-02

    Original file (00952-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 / Dl 0 13 N 22 Nov 2002 OZUO650 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 1 Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00952-02 with microfiche service record 1. for an Enlistment Bonus (EB). Navy Recruiting Command and the Petty does not have an EB contract in his service record is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06895-02

    Original file (06895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO591 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN w Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06895-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02

    Original file (04972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02

    Original file (05739-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01

    Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03932-02

    Original file (03932-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13 12 Aug 2002 ODl/ OZUO430 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION NAVAL RECORDS OF Subj: Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03932-02 with microfiche service reccrd The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. -does not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05083-01

    Original file (05083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. 20350~2000 N OF THE NAV Y S REPLY REFER TO IN 5420 N130Dl/OlU1252 12 Sep 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS CASE FIREMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05083-01 with microfiche service record The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01

    Original file (04692-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05754-02

    Original file (05754-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. NAV Y IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/02U0587 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RECOMMENDATION SE OF PETTY OFFICER \ Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05754-02 with...