DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
10 October 2002
4098-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 October 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 24 August 1987 at age 19.
period 9 to 16 September 1987, you were counseled on three
occasions concerning poor motivation and disciplinary
Subsequently, a recruit evaluation report rated you
infractions.
as poor in seven of eight categories and stated that you were
immature and failed to realize the seriousness of your situation.
On 21 September 1987 a recruit aptitude board recommended an
administrative separation.
During the
On 22 September 1987 you were notified of separation processing
due to your failure to adapt.
object to this separation."
authority directed an entry level separation by reason of entry
level performance/conduct,
1987.
At that time you acknowledged that you were not
recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
At that time you stated
After review the separation
"I do not
and you were so separated on 1 October
You state in your application that you are being denied
employment as a Federal prison guard because of the RR-4
reenlistment code.
You believe that if the code is changed
you
will be hired.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated by reason of entry level
performance/conduct.
than others in your situation,
or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
Since you have been treated no differently
the Board could not find an error
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01763-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. The Board found that your Navy record shows that you were given complete recruit training but were unable or every opportunity to unwilling to do so. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03130-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08385-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so separated on 17 June At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and Subsequently, the separation t:Lme you stated "I do not At that You desire a change in the reenlistment code so that you can again serve in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a cor:cection of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02472-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed that the psychiatric history and the poor adjustment to recruit training were sufficient to justify the assignment of the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02098-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated due to an erroneous enlistment or when an individual fails to complete recruit training. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06921-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 10 August 2005, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17. On 28 September 2005, you were counseled...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04437-01
discharged on 20 July 1999 by reason of erroneous entry and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. court- Thereafter, the discharge authority You were so The doctor's statement does not challenge Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual separation by reason of a erroneous enlistment. situational anxiety suggests that the unique stresses of military service could easily exacerbate this problem.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06986-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 February 1986, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 30 October 1987, you acknowledged by a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11592-08
A three-member “panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2°’ September 2009. After careful and’ conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 19 May 1987, you were notified of administrative separation processing for entry level performance/conduct as evidenced by your failure to adapt...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09660-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...