DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:mh
Docket No: 4075-02
9 July 2002
This is in reference to
pursuant to the provisions
your application
01‘ title
10
t‘or
correction
ot‘
ot‘ the United Slates
your deceased
(lode, section
spouse‘s naval record
1552.
three-nieniber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
01) 9 July
2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
adniinistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
Docunientary material considered by the Board consisted of your
A
session, considered your application
were reviewed in accordance with
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with all material
and applicable statutes,
opinion furnished by
regl)lations and policies.
NIT memorandum
13
of‘
subiiiittccl in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record
Iii addition, the Board considered the advisory
June 2002, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
such
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an official
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
that favorable action cannot be taken.
upon submission of new and material
naval record, the burden is
illjustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000
Y
13 June 02
MEMORANI
3UM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)
Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB)
(a) BCNR Pay memo of
(b)
DOD Financial Management Regulation
16 May 02
(Vol 7B)
(1) Navy Retried/Retainer Pay Data Form
NAVCOMPT Form 2272
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
1.
In response to reference (a),
recommend the BCNR not correct
only category of coverage
effective 26 November
1984..
record to reflect that he enrolled in the spouse
in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
2 .
The recommendation is based on the following:
a.
30 November 1984.
child only category at that time.
transferred to the Fleet Reserve on
Per the enclosure,
he enrolled in the SBP
He died 8 September 1995.
quired by law,
election of
chi
concurred with
rage.
C .
Reference (b) states in part that children are eligible
beneficiaries if they are unmarried and under the age of 18; or
over age 18,
have suffered a mental or physical incapacity.
but under age 22 and still in school full
time; or
In view of the children's eligibility,
3.
entitled to an SBP annuity.
is not
Retired Admin Section
Head,
Casualty Assistance and Retired
Activities Branch (PERS-665)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-01
When you were divorced in November 1999 the court ordered you to furnish your former spouse with SBP coverage. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct Petty Officer -record changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage category within one year of his divorce. Additionally, a member who refuses coverage for an eligible spouse in favor of children only category is prohibited from electing spouse coverage at a later date...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00057-02
opinion furnished by ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory 25 March 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error upon submission of new and material In this regard, it is important iIl.justice. throughout the Navy between 1972 and 1979 called for a member's spouse to be notified of a member's declination by a letter.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07810-02
SCPO Benefit Plan (SBP) using his full retired pay as his base amount prior to transferring to Fleet Reserve. The recommendation is based on the following: a. SCPO transferred to the Fleet Reserve on He enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) 31 August 1980. spouse only coverage category at the minimum base amount of $300.00. The enclosure indicates b. and he had two other opportunities ?had three subsequent opportunities to base amount for the SBP after his The first was during the 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01956-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1956-01 12 June 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08056-01
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, quarterly newsletter) PERS-62 and local Retired Activities Offices been available to provide information regarding SBP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08054-02
Your allegations of error and session, considered injustice were reviewed to the proceedings of this your application, together naval record and the advisory opinion fumis attached. Chief Petty Officer voluntarily change (SBP) from spouse t year of his divorce of 27 Sep 02 ference (a), P recommend the BCNR not correct record to reflect that he former ction under the Survivor Benefit Plan spouse category coverage within one 2. I year period, the De (DFAS -CL ) will auto deductions...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10865-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 10865-02 22 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07590-01
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. In response to reference (a), record to reflect that he enrolled in the Survivor lan (SBP) prior to transferring to the Fleet Reserve on recommend BCNR not correct PO1 5 November 1974. Public Law 92-425, which enacted SBP on 21 September 1972, provided that a retiree's participation in SBP at the maximum level was automatic unless...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07794-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s In addition, the Board considered After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. letter from DFAS-CL dated 14 June 1999 which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09865-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. requested to enroll her spouse in the SBP on 7 August 2006.