DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
TRG
Docket No:
22 November 2002
4079-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 October 1981 at age 19.
You then served without incident for about 18 months.
period from 26 April to 6 June 1983 you received three
nonjudicial punishments.
absence of about 16 hours, disobedience, disrespect, and
possession of drug paraphernalia and marijuana.
Your offenses were an unauthorized
During the
you were processed for an
Based on the foregoing record,
administrative discharge by reason of misconduct.
with this processing, you elected to waive the right to have your
On 8 August
case heard by an administrative discharge board.
1983 the discharge authority approved the recommendation of your
commanding officer that you be discharged for misconduct with a
You were so
discharge under other than honorable conditions.
discharged on 8 August 1983.
In connection
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
initial period of good service.
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
The Board concluded
discharge given your repeated misconduct.
such as your youth and the
The Board found that these
that the discharge was proper as
warranted.
issued and no change is
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07438-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your conviction by a special court-martial of an unauthorized absence of about 167 days, a period of more than five...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04342-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, service in the Naval Reserve and your initial period of good service in the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02585-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 WMP Docket No: 19 August 2002 2585-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07358-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were so discharged on 28 October 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04041-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together.with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01573-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2010. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, desire to upgrade your discharge, and assertion that your alcohol abuse was the result of a bombing incident that occurred in Beirut, Lebanon, on 23 October 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03829-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00312-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. Subsequently, you tested positive for marijuana on two random urinalyses of 22 June and 2 August 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05500-01
On 23 March 1984 the discharge authority approved the recommendation of your commanding officer that you be discharged for misconduct with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and especially the multiple instances of possession and use of marijuana. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00599-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further, the suspended reduction to paygrade E-3 was vacated from the previous NJP. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...