DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No:
20 August 2002
4095-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N130C3/02U0340 of 3 July 2002, a copy of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
Y
S
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200
N
0
1"
N130C3/02U0340
RLPiY
RLFCI<
7220
Ser
3 July
IN
2OOG?
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Via:
Subj:
.
‘
_
I
-
_____
-.
Ref:
(a) U.S.C., Title 37, 501
Encl:
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#04095-02 w/Microfiche Service
Per your request, the following recommendation concerning
1 .
enclosure (1) is provided.
Enclosure (1) indicates a request to exempt the maximum number
(LSL) that a member can sell back during
2.
of days of Lump Sum Leave
a career.
A review of the petitioner's Master Military Pay Account
3.
(MMPA) revealed that he has sold back a total of
his military career.
during a career is 60 days IAW reference (a).
The maximum LSL a member can sell back
60 days during
N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request to
4.
exceed the maximum number of day of LSL IAW reference (a). No
waivers are authorized under the law.
Allowances
SLction
(N13OC)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03793-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03407-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3407-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title IJnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. 30 October 200 1 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05447-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08935-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4403-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10791-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to payment of 60 days lump sum leave (LSL)2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 Jun 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04064-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00050-02
Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPS) from IAW reference (a), members seeking 12 June 1997 to 6 June 2001. appointment to be designated as medical officer who are on active duty as an officer must resign their commission, or as an enlisted person must request a discharge from active duty. active duty for any other period while In no case shall any member be Upon completion of the program para. Therefore, request for payment due to the petitioner and TLE IAW Reference (c).