Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01
Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No:  
8 January 2002

3955-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N130D 

l/01 U 1198 of 6 August 2001, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board  ‘substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350.2000

Y

S

N

IN REPLY REFER
542 0
N130Dl/  
6
Aug 01

 

TO

OlU1198

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#03955-01  with microfiche service record

The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman

1.
Brady's petition.

N130 recommends denial of Seaman

2.
Enlistment Bonus (EB).

petition for an

a Navy Veteran (NAVET) enlisted in the Navy

3. Seaman
through the Delayed Entry Program (DEP), on 27 March 2001 under the
NAVET PRISE III Advanced Electronic Field (AEF)  
Electronic Computer Field (AECF) Program.
he did not receive and EB as he 
she-tiing he did not receive an EB during his previous enlistment.
In his petition Seaman Brady requests favorable action that will
allow payment of the EB.

was unable to provide verification

/ Advanced

Seamaw  claims that

EB is not an entitlement,

The EB program is budgeted on quotas
Navy Recruiting Command and the Enlisted

not by the number of A-school accession seats.

but a recruiting tool used at the
4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
provided to the Commander,
Community Manager,
Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB.
guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4.
1160.6A,  prior service members must who have
with OPNAVINST  
previously received an EB are not eligible to receive an EB.
only offered while the member is in DEP or during reclassification
At no other time may a recruit be
at Recruit Training Command.
does not have an EB contract in his
offered an EB.
is not entitled to an EB.
service record and therefore

Seama

EB Contracts are

In accordance

EB is

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

Subj 

:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN

Assistant,
Programs Branch

Enlisted Bonus



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06895-02

    Original file (06895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO591 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN w Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06895-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01

    Original file (04692-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05907-01

    Original file (05907-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/01~1407 19 Dee 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05907-01 with microfiche service record 1. Navy Recruiting Command and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02

    Original file (04268-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Seaman 2001. and signed an EB contract in the to Recruit Training Command (RTC) requests.favorable action that Kicker in addition to the EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. Correction of Naval Records, Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06687-01

    Original file (06687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In his petition, Seaman-claims that an EB was erroneously left out of his contract and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Seaman s processing electronic archived record reveals no offered EB quota.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04314-01

    Original file (04314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    his classifier could not establish whether Seaman Apprentice had ever received and EB and instructed him to petition the .an Other Service Veteran (OSVET), e Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 26 In his petition, he states that ection of Naval Records (BCNR) for an EB. Seaman Apprentice EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the The EB program is budgeted on quotas Navy Recruiting 4 . does not have an EB Contract in his At no other time may a member petition for an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03727-02

    Original file (03727-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Seaman Navy Recruiting Command and the ‘A" School does not have an EB contract in his service record and therefore is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01

    Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110026 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl : (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08060-00

    Original file (08060-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/0lU1102 22 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF Encl: (1) BCNR case file #08060-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07826-00

    Original file (07826-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted ‘in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB). In his petition, -claims his recruiter promised him an EB and Seaman requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.