DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 3951-02
4 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum
attached.
1400/3 MMPR-2 of 5 June 2002, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5104
IN REPLY REFER
TO.
1400/3
MMPR-2
5 Jun 02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Ref:
OF
(a) DD Form 149 of 12 Apr 02
(b) BCNR Document Number 03951-02 dtd 23 Apr 02
(c) MMPR-2
1400/5 MMPR-2 dtd 5
ltr
Dee
1.
Per references (a) and (b),
her date of rank to corporal co
believes she was due to receive promotion to corporal
day of the 7th month of reenlistment.
o have
on the 1st
2 .
ree
different information.
Marine Corps Recruiting Command, the second message is the
correct message for promotion purposes.
request contains two prior service
with the same date
phonecon with
Per a
time
of
was discharged from the Marine Corps as a private
The statement of understanding she signed was
3 .
first class.
given to her due to an administrative error.
understanding she signed was designed for a corporal who was
brought back in as a lance corporal.
understanding for the rank of private first class.
There is no statement of
The statement of
As stated in reference (c),
with an appointment to the grade of
4.
reenlistment for 4 years,
private first class with 6 months and 23 days time and grade.
Accordingly,
corrected to 26 December 1998,
of reenlistment.
grade and 9 months time in service requirement, and was properly
promoted to lance corporal.
effective 19 July 1999 the date
On 1 August 1999 she met the 8 months time in
her date of rank to private first class was
as authorized
In order for
5.
promotion to corporal during the time frame she feels was
promised to her,
corporal vice a private
lance corporal being the date of her reenlistment.
she would have had to reenlist as a lance
to have been eligible for
first class with her effective date to
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06097-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01049-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF In order to be promoted to lance corporal, a Marine must have at least eight months time in grade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04832-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03636-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 19 July 1999, a copy of which is attached. Per paragraph 1204.3 of reference (b), it states that the assignment to weight control is a promotion restriction, therefore he was not eligible for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01325-02
During processing his recruiter told him that he would (E-3) and be immediately e. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps for 4 years of active duty on 28 August 2000 under the provisions of the Prior Service Enlisted Program (PSEP) and was given a date of rank of 2 June 1997 as a lance corporal, (E-3). paygrade E-4 until he met the 6 months active duty CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, notwithstanding the comments contained in enclosure Board finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02208-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2000. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07443-06
7443—069 Jan 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05934-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,, Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5809 13
MIQ did not address the entries dated 23 May or 17 July 2012. c. In enclosure (3), JAM, the HOMC Judge Advocate Division, Military Justice Branch commented to the effect that all the entries at issue should be removed, because the entries dated 23 January, 23 May and 17 July 2012 were improperly backdated, and the entries dated 20 January and 23 March 2012 were issued after Petitioner should have been promoted on 1 May 2011. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing - the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07203-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ~r.-e~uests DD 214 to verify his rank of corporal.