Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04036-02
Original file (04036-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

1-F’: yrj
.I 
Docket No:
9 July  

2002

 

40X-02

A three-member  
panel  
session, considered your
were reviewed in
proceedings of this

 
 

01‘ 

~tle 
 

for 
13oml 
applic;~tion  

Corrcc~ion 
011 

.luly 

9 

3002. 

Your 

01‘ Naval  

liecorcls, sitting in executive
allegations  of  error and injustice

;~ccorda~icc’ 
Board.

atl~liiilisli-ali\ ‘c‘ 
In;lli’ri;ll  

r~g~~laliotis  
considcrcd  

and 
by 

l>oc~~i~ii~iir~~i-!~  

b\.itli 

proced~lres 

applicabte  to the

llie Board consisted of your

record  and
the advisory
a copy of which

 

01‘ the entire record, the Board

 

found  that the

After careful and conscientious consideration
evidence submitted was
injustice. In this connection. the
the advisory opinion.
the members of the

Accordingly, 
panel 
tw 

u~ill 

 

 

 

insuf‘l‘icient to establish  

Ihe existence of

 

t,robable  material error or

Board substantially  
your application  

t‘~Iniislird  

upon 

conciirred with the comments contained in
has 
bee11  denied. The names and votes of
rectucsl.

ot‘ your case  

circtlmstancc’s  
the 

are 
Roard reconsider its 

It is regretted  
that the  
You are entitled to have 
evidence or other matter not previously considered
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of
demonstrate the existence of

such 
tlccision  
by the Board.

  an  official  naval  record, the burden is

probable material error or

tlstice.

kilmi 

ir1.j 

 

 

 

that favorable action cannot be taken.

siibiiiission of new and material
In  this regard, it is important

  on  the applicant to

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 
32/613 
; 
2002,

1 

JUN 

CJ

From:
To:

Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Ref:

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  
(b)  COMNAVCRUITCOM 

1130.8F

ltr 1133  Ser 32 of 29 Jan 02

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr.   04036-02

1.

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

Per reference (a)
was authorized to enlist as an E-3
and reference (b),
with AM "A" School. Upon successful competition of "A" School he
~began AM "A" School on
will be advanced to  
29 Apr 02 and has not yet successfully completed "A" School.

AM3/E-4.

7

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

Correction  of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02208-02

    Original file (02208-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    mh MEH: Docket No: 2208-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the IJnitetl States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the OI,I for accord;mce with A three-member panel of the Hoard session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of this application, together with applicable statutes, opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02472-02

    Original file (02472-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05306-02

    Original file (05306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-02

    Original file (00870-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08767-02

    Original file (08767-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 8767-02 14 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03644-02

    Original file (03644-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. a copy of which opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08644-02

    Original file (08644-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07826-02

    Original file (07826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ap,lication on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6207 of 13 November 2002, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04122-02

    Original file (04122-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05291-02

    Original file (05291-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...