NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07954-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. In your case, the assignment of that code was also appropriate due to the civil conviction and two NJPs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07955-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consi stetl of your application, together with all nlaterial sub~nittetl in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 111 addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Ser P80B10305 of 2 1 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07958-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your application, thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07960-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 7960-01 6 November 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 lJ.S.C. 1552 Encl : (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments (JSMC LETTER Sul3.ject’s naval record 1400/4A MMPR-2 of 10 JUL 01 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07961-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Documentary material considered by the Board Your allegations of error and After careful...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07962-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07963-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 7220.9 Ser (3) Subject ’s naval record 201/SUS75984 of 5 January 1996 From To: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. L. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07964-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 14 January 2000 An RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07967-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was approved by the appropriate authorities to participate in the Aviation Career Continuation Pay (ACCP) Training and Administration of the Reserve (TAR) Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pauling, Taylor, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07969-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards, dated 27 March 2001, a copy of which is attached. tolerating medications and had no He was well The - 27 January 2000, the PEB reevaluated the Petitioner's case and reduced his disability rating to 30%.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07969-01
RECOMMENI>ATlON: I )ockt No: 7969-O 1 ROBERT Recorder I). %SAI.MAN I_. AI)Ah/lS (i. Acling Recorder 30 NOVCII~~~C~I- 300 I
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 September 200 1. allega\.ions of error and 2. (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of the iI?justice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07977-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that when Petitioner graduated from the Naval Academy he was awarded a designator of 1100. The Board, consisting of Messrs Dunn, Neuschafer, and M S Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07983-99
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recently received birth certificate that showed your age at However, these factors were not enlistment would have been 16. sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your four believe the birth certificate in your record that was confirmed by your parents. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07986-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 12 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation met on 10 October Sergean The petitioner contends the comments made by both th 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07990-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07992-01
1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing for designated location of dependents. adclressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ROBERT...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07993-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he extended his active duty agreement for obligated service to 31 May 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07994-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 200 1 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07995-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) MSG R 0316002 (3) Subject ’s naval record AlJG 01 ZYB Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and in-justice on 6 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07997-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the enlistment of 24 July 2000 is for a period of two (2) years vice four (4) years. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Z&man, and Ms.Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and injustice on 30 October determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07998-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07999-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated drug abuse...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08002-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his DD Form 214 reflects that he was a selectee for advancement to paygrade E-4. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Leeman, and Ms. Wiley, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08003-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. P1900.16E, Marine Corps Separations MC0 if a Marine does not meet all reenlistment we recommend the Board for correction of Naval Records Additionally, unqualified Per 5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08003-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE N A V Y B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J LP: yrj Docket No: 8003-01 19 June 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of' Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 [J.S.C. Pursuant to the provision.\ of reikrence (a), Subject hereinat't~~r refert-etl to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Boartl reqilesting, in effect, that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08005-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 12 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. ness report for the period 010101 to 010226 Reference (b) is the performance evaluation 2. This was Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON SERGEA BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF STAFF USMC considered especially relevant given the age of the report when reference (a) was first...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08010-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08016-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner extended for 12 months. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08017-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when tirst eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mimer, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08020-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 August 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Reserve Personnel Center dated 3 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08023-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08029-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. 2. certain criteria are entitled to constructive credit. 6 months and 9 days of active duty and was not entitled to Enclosure (1) shows member only completed 19 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08031-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by upgrading the discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 26 May 1992. considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. majority believes his immaturity played a key role in th%% sole incident of misconduct in more...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08034-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08035-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08037-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2002. However, regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when an individual is at risk to harm herself or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08040-99
18 Jan 1995: rear-ended-twice- complained of neck pain and tingling; mentioned mid and low back pain. MC, USN John C4pT. Civilian 8188 Back sprain treated at July Dee 3 care by physical therapy for “mechanical LBP ” treated with medication and requested report from civilian 17 Sept 1990 “hit from behind ” in “shoulder pain ” MVA” complaining of headache, backache and ortho (no report seen) Regarding the 17 April 1996 history and physical qualified for discharge on his final physical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08041-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The member provided a copy of her statement and reporting senior’s endorsement with her petition. When the member’s statement and reporting senior’s endorsement is returned and found suitable for filing, we will place it in the member’s digitized record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08049-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the GSM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08060-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/0lU1102 22 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF Encl: (1) BCNR case file #08060-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08061-01
1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments CMC memorandum Subject’s naval record 1400/4A MMPR-2 of 14 September 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08062-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believes that the page 13 entries were sufficient to Regulations require a support separation action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08062-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive considered,your application on 13 December 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08066-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 8066-01 6 November 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 IJ.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. trtie and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08069-00
not go before the Board. his record. uone of one" rating provides However, a The inclusion of this fitness report would likely The first missing fitness report in question (960401-970331) 2. was a favorable report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08083-00
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 17 July 1992. Beckett, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08086-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08088-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. On 16 June 2000 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) denied your request for an upgrade of the discharge. Further, this contention is quite different from what you told the NDRB.