DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
BIG
Docket No:
8 August 2001
802040
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 August 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Reserve Personnel Center dated
3 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this,
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVALRESERVEPERSONNELCENTER
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70149-7800
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD OF CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: P
Ref:
(a) BUPERSINST
(b) SECNAVINST
1430.16D
1820.2B
Encl:
(1) BCNR Case File Number 08020-00
IN REPLY REFER TO:
5420
Ser
May 3,
01/0034
2007
After reviewing Petty Officer First
1.
application for correction of his militar
is returned with the following findings and recommendations:
Cl
a.
Documentation was not on file in Petty
Offi
record indicating he was ever advanced to Chief Pet
Additionally,
drilling participant within six months of the date of release from
active duty,
advanced based upon the active duty advancement examination.
as required per reference (a),
not a satisfactory
as Petty Office
he was ineligible to be
b.
Reference (b) states enlisted members, upon assignment
or transfer to the Retired Reserve shall be retired in the
highest pay grade in which they have satisfactorily served.
Because petitioner did not serve as a Chief Petty Officer,
advancement can not be authorized.
-1
L.
Recommend petitioner's application for advancement to
hicrhest
pav
urade be denied.
Commanding Officer
Reserve
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03604-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806586
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subject member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and or remove injustices in the service record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02552-08
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In accordance with reference (b), advancement to E7 requires selection board action. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05470-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum which is attached. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08517-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 25 September 2001 8517-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10071-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner contacted Retired Operations Section (N-152), enclosure (2), requesting clarification on retired status. Per enclosure (4) advancement on the retired list to the grade of CWO2 would result in a loss of pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04272-06
Chief Petty Officer XXXX was selected to Senior Chief Petty Officer with an effective date of 16 December 1998.b. BCNR ltr LCC:ddj Docket No: 9653-02 of 1 April 2003, directed Chief retroactive advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer be effective since there was no advisory indicating he was not in an eligible status to be advanced on that date. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF HMCM Per reference (c), Chief XXXX new Time in Rate established his first eligibility for consideration to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08710-00
The fitness report in question is a Periodic/Regular report. The fitness report itself represents the opinions of the reporting senior. Chief as petitioned for advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer due to a Fitness Report he believes to be unjust.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08743-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You believe there was disparate treatment because the chief petty officer only received a punitive letter of reprimand and was retained in the Navy,...