Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00
Original file (08045-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTM.ENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 8045-00
13 March 2001

This is in reference 
provisions of title 

to,your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

l&of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAW  

DIRIOWWIL  COMMAND

57DO  

IWTIDRITY  

DRIVE

YlLLllDTON  

TN 

38051-0000

5420
PERS-862

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

(a) Assistant for BCNR Matters 5420 PERS-OOZCB Memo of

11 Jan 01
(b) Commander,

NPC

ltr 1306 PERS

913 of 29 Jun 00

Encl:

(1) BCNR File 

#08045-00

Per reference (a), the following
1.
are submitted concerning Petty Office

and recommendations
case.

Per reference (b), Petty Officer
2.
into the Enlisted TAR Program provid
reduction to YN3.
contractual agreement to recall into the TAR Program.

He accepted reduction to YN3 as part of his

as approved for recall
ccept  an administrative

3.

In view of the

above, we recommend

Petty Officer

-

.__

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03211-01

    Original file (03211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, is attached your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory your a copy of which After...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00092-01

    Original file (00092-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The final multiple required for TAR advancement to PR1 is 208.58.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02307-01

    Original file (02307-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. She was recalled to active duty for two The effective date of advancement to CTAl selected for advancement to February 1997 (Cycle 060) CTAl Navywide She was properly denied advancement to CTAl...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02

    Original file (01576-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02

    Original file (07022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03362-01

    Original file (03362-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05495-01

    Original file (05495-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08670-98

    Original file (08670-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02290-00

    Original file (02290-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06066-00

    Original file (06066-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COIklMAND DFllVE 5720 INTEGRITY NAVY PERSONNEL MILLINGTON TN 3805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE...