NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08667-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08667-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Cooper, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08668-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing or correcting the fitness report for 1 October 1996 to 12 April 1997, a copy of which is at Tab A. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting removal of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08669-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08689-00
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HQMC Memo 1741 MMSR-6 of 10 Apr 01 (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference 1. former officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 4 May 2000 and that he was promoted to CAPT (O-3). Hardbower, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08690-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J LP: ddj Docket No: 8690-01 14 March 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, corisisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Mackey, and Geisler, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i~ijustice on 12 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08694-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-1 vice the RE-4 code he was assigned on 14 May 1997. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Ensley and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08696-00
1552 (1) (2) (3) (4) DD Form 149 w/attachments E-mail from CMC memo Petitioner's Microfiche MSgt Hull, Career Counselor 1400/3, MMPR-2, 12 Feb 01 filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval paygrade E-8 for the CY96 Active Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject, 1. hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to remedial promotion consideration to Reserve (AR) Staff Noncommissioned Officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08697-01
A three-member panel of the Board for CorrectLon of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08703-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08704-01
IJpo~i review antl consideration of all tlie evitlence of record, antl especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Hoard finds the existence of an i~i.justlce warrar~ting the following corrective action. Docket No: 8704-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: I . of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured co~iipliance with its provisions, i t is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08705-00
ordered to pay $551.25 and court costs. Further, the Board noted that there is no evidence in your record, and you submitted none, to support your contention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08708-01
A three-n~ember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application o n 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereol', your naval record arid applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08709-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08715-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08718-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 19 April 1989 you were honorably In this regard, the Board noted that the record Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08720-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing a service record page 11 ( “Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 31 July 1992. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) “) counseling entry dated 31 July 1992. corrective action by this Headquarters...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08722-00
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, Petty Officer Grau ’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 23 February 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08724-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX ; WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 8724-00 8 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ee Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E3 based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08725-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2002. He stated that he had been taking lfyellow jackets" since being in the navy for 3-1/2 years. On 23 July 1954 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of unfitness.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08732-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 8732-00 15 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08733-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH : ddj Docket No: 8733-00 27 March 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone CTR rating. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08735-01
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08740-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 27 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08742-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be filed enclosure (1) corrected to show his original date of rank was assigned when the administrative reduction in grade was set aside and entitled to back pay for the period of the administrative reduction. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08743-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You believe there was disparate treatment because the chief petty officer only received a punitive letter of reprimand and was retained in the Navy,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08758-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 8 ' ~ u n e 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 27870-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 27870-01 17 September 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to the Navy College Fund...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 3203-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 3808-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) (3) Subject ’s naval record NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 SER 334/64 14 of 16 July 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show the reenlistment executed years, vice 4 years. Sul>.ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be on or about 6 November 2000 is for a term of 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. 2. allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 5024-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. While the request is not in your record, it is presumed that you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the foregoing offenses. Consequently, when...