Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08023-00
Original file (08023-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 8023-00
6 February 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Fw=---- ---

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER 8511244 of 5 January 2001
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show advanced when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

(2), the office having cognizance over the

b.

subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
contents of enclosure 
following corrective action.

and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the

Docket No: 8023-00

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a. Petitioner was advanced to 

paygrade E-6 effective 16 June 1998.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record.

Correctiofi of Naval
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for 
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

~~.~_5
L.’ ADAMS
G. 
Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

6 February 2001

Executive 

Direc



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07412-00

    Original file (07412-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08017-00

    Original file (08017-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when tirst eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mimer, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07928-00

    Original file (07928-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08261-00

    Original file (08261-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was permanently advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07840-00

    Original file (07840-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 7840-O RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08176-00

    Original file (08176-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06875-00

    Original file (06875-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Kastner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08709-00

    Original file (08709-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05953-02

    Original file (05953-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, they do not feel this would be remedial, as Petitioner did not request it; and NPC has advised that if she were considered by such a special selection board, a failure of selection might well result, which would effectively negate the benefit of removing her failure by the FY 03 Line Commander Selection Board. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06108-02

    Original file (06108-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 HD: hd Docket No: 06 108-02 4 November 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LC Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD S (a) Title 10 U.S.C. They recommended against a special board for the FY 03 f. The memorandum for the record at enclosure (4) documents that a representative of the Bureau of Naval Personnel Petitioner’s record to show...