Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08010-00
Original file (08010-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 8010-00
20 August 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, dated 21 June 2001, a
copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal thereto.

~

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially 
concur-r& with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

’

I 
bDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

5420
PERS-821
21 Jun 2001

From:
To:
Via:

Subj:

Commander Navy Personnel Command (PERS-821)
Executive Director,
Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-OOZCB

Board for Correction of Naval Records

REQUEST
SMl

FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF

USN(RET),

Ref:

(a) 

Pers-COZCB  

ltr  5420

of 31 May 01

reply to reference (a),
request to be placed on

this office does not support Mr.
active duty in a medical hold status.

Mr. 

3_  requested to be transferred to the Fleet Reserve

2.
effective 30 
Personnel are 
disqualifying medical conditions prior to transfer to the Fleet
Reserve. Mr.
30 September 2000 as requested.

Septe!mber  2000 which was subsequently granted.
required  to undergo a physical examination to identify

was transferred to the Fleet Reserve effective

The Physical Evaluation Board has never received a medical

adjudication through the Disability Evaluation System in

3.
board for
the case of Mr.

This office recommends Mr.

4.
programs afforded to military
continued medical care.

utilize other medical care
retirees in the pursuit of

n be of any further assistance, I can be reached 

at*



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05291-01

    Original file (05291-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 March and 1 April 2002, copies of which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01504-02

    Original file (01504-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. case it was due to General...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05721-03

    Original file (05721-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ?,lve determined that only members who transfer to the Fleet ;3eserve after 4 December 1987 are eligible for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00444-03

    Original file (00444-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The information given in DK1 incorrect, insomuch that reference (b) states that the separation code JFM is "physical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00

    Original file (08299-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01832-02

    Original file (01832-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, Petitioner requests to be retired (b) requires TO years active commissioned service Reference 2. to retire as an officer. request was erroneously processed through PERS-822; while correcting that error, Navy as an officer while a member of the Fleet Reserve and only served 5 years, service. If I indeed do not have the 10 years required to retired as an officer, I certainly have the more than thirty years total active and inactive service to allow me retirement at the highest...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01184-02

    Original file (01184-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 Pers 823 of 22 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07547-06

    Original file (07547-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. VOL 7BDODFMR 430101.Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMt4ENDATIONS IN CASE OF Issue : Whether law or equity dictates correction ofdecedent’s records to reflect election of former spouse SBP coverage?

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05531-00

    Original file (05531-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Opportunity to draw education benefits from the VEGIB Program ended on 31 December 1989. b. VEGIB Program members who were on active duty any time between 19 October 1984 and 1 July 1985 and served continuously from that date through 30 June 1988, followed by four years in the Selected Reserves, had their remaining entitlement converted to Montgomery...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01806-01

    Original file (01806-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 913 of 17 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...