DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 7964-00
6 April 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title
States Code, Section 1552.
10, United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
of this
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
the entire
After careful and conscientious consideration of
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 18 February 2000 the commanding officer directed
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on
at age 19.
separation based on your concealment of preservice civil
convictions.
On 24 February 2000 you received an entry level
separation by reason of misconduct due to fraudulent entry. At
that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of
RE-4.
14 January 2000
An RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and
must be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of
fraudulent enlistment.
error or injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board thus concluded that there is no
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07641-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07154-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. Given your concealment of your preservice arrest Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separation because of a fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03854-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. the discharge authority directed a general discharge by reason of He stated that the Navy had invested consider- fraudulent entry. determining what your true statement is, the governor of your state or the one you made while at the service school.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01
Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06763-00
were so separated on 21 July 2000. assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. The Board noted that the evidence in your Marine Corps record was sufficient to refute the conclusion of your psychologist that you are qualified to serve in the military. the evidence-f your poor adjustment in recruit training and your admission to a fraudulent enlistment were sufficient to support separation from the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02482-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your e.rror and application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance ldith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this considereld by the Board consisted of Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must The Board thus separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05669-09
+ : A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged for fraudulent entry and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09632-02
A three-member panel o$ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Although the documents concerning your separation processing are not contained in your records, it is clear that you were processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to your failure to disclose pre-service medical treatment and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03183-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 January 2003, the Department of the Navy, Central Adjudication Facility (DON CAF) informed you via your commanding officer (CO), of their...