DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No:
15 January 2002
8035-01
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1)
(2)
(3)
DD Form 149 w/attachments
NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811 of 3 December 2001
Subject’s naval record
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show advanced when first eligible.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs.
Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
McPartlin,
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
Docket No:
8035-01
a.
Petitioner was advanced to
Petitioner scored 2 11.38 on the September SK
Multiple Cut (FMC) to make
eligible to take based on backdating E-5. The FMC for September 1998 was 225.00,
March 1999 was 222.50, September 1999 was 218.33, and March
paygrade E-6 from any of the exams he would have been
paygrade E-5 effective 16 December 1996. (NOTE:
1 exam. That score did not meet the Final
2001 was 224.49.)
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
15 January 2002
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07485-98
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 7485-98 1 April 1999 From: To: Subj : Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary, of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 16 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08659-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 September 200 1. allega\.ions of error and 2. (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of the iI?justice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner earned Pass Not Advanced 2001 Exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00997-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCorniick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an i~ijustice warranting the following corrective action. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04611-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08663-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08229-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) removed 1996 weight control entries relating to Petitioner from the Marine Corps Total Force System after he had been considered and not selected by the CY 1999 and not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10538-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Kim, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 September 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07596-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the RM rating; and to backdate the effective date of advancement to IT2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to...