DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 8060-00
13 August 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N130D 1
/Ol U 1102 of 22 June 2001, a copy of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
N
WASHINGTON. D.C.
20350-2000
S
IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
N130D1/0lU1102
22 Jun 01
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj
:
COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION
IN THE CASE OF
Encl:
(1) BCNR case file
#08060-00 with microfiche service record
The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman
1 .
Conner's petition.
N130 recommends denial of
2.
Enlistment Bonus (EB).
petition for an
entered the Navy through the NAVET PRISE III as
for conversion to the PN rating on 22 February 2000.
3
a Seaman
In her petition,
that will allow payment of an EB.
claims requests favorable action
but a recruiting tool used at the
EB is not an entitlement,
4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals
to enlist in critical skills.
quotas provided to the Commander,
the Enlisted Community Manager,
accession seats.
EB.
record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.
5.
herewith as enclosure (1).
BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned
Every recruit is not offered nor receives an
oes not have an EB contract in her service
The EB program is budgeted on
Navy Recruiting Command and
not by the number of A-school
Programs Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07826-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted ‘in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB). In his petition, -claims his recruiter promised him an EB and Seaman requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01056-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y N 0 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 23 Mar 200 0 0~0212 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08238-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. N 20350-2000 Y S IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/OlU0075 6 MAR 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #08238-00 with microfiche service record 1. Enlistment Bonus (EB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03281-01
D.C. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1’ 6 Aug 01 01LJ1200 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03281-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. for an Enlistment Bonus (EB). Challenge Program Guarantee petition, reclassification at RTC he was not offered an EB and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03840-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05907-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/01~1407 19 Dee 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05907-01 with microfiche service record 1. Navy Recruiting Command and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02442-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N 13 0 D2 22 Nov 2003 /02UO66& MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07125-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. would allow payment of an EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is included in her contract. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and s a valid EB Contract in the amount of $4,000 5. that payment upon completion of her training an pipeline and qualification in the skill for which she was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.