DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
Docket No: 8040-99
29 January 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 January 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by a designee of the Specialty Leader for
Orthopedic Surgery. dated 24 December 2000, a copy of which is attached, and your
response thereto.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
in the advisory opinion.
disability at the time of your discharge from the Marine Corps. Accordingly, your
b’
application has been denied, The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
It was unable to conclude that you were unfit by reason of physical
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Naval Medical Center San Diego, Suite 112
34800 Bob Wilson Drive
San Diego, California 92134-1112
(619) 532-8427, -8429
/ (619) 532-8467 Fax
24
Dee 00
From: Director Orthopaedic Spine Service and Department Chairman
Naval Medical Center San Diego CA 92 134-5000
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
VIA: Captain Dana Covey, Specialty Advisor for
Subj:
;
Orthopaedics
[Docket No
8040-991
1.
2.
3.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ncluding the VA
ing the
I have personally prepared this report after reviewing (in depth) the records
forwarded in the case of form
documentation and
medical-
active duty.
mequested via DDF 149, dated 02 December 1999 that his
record be changed “to a medical discharge and retire; ” and that he was “in a
light duty status 2 years prior to discharge because of my back. I refused
surgery for my back
VA documentation an
review only addresses the back and neck.
The following notations refer to extractions from the medical record:
d have been retired. ” Because of the
statement “because of my back,” this
SNM’s period of
F/U after MVA from 14 January 1995,
95-c/0 continued backpain, headaches and
”
88/93 he checked positive for recurrent back pain. The
“ S/P MVA-Jan
From his discharge history and physical 17 April 1996: the patient reports “my
back hurts off and on-still have back spasms. ” The doctor noted, “1 year s/p
motor vehicle injury, chronic LBP and HA+ whiplash injury.
A patient DDF 2697 entry by the patient: Back and neck pain-can ’t carry a
full pack on my back-to heavy and (can ’t) carry a machinegun
From 12 Sept 1995
doctor annotated,
neck pain-continues traction with physical therapy and ortho (treatment).
18 Jan 1995:
rear-ended-twice-
complained of neck pain and tingling; mentioned mid and low back pain.
Treated with light duty, medications and heat.
TAMC ER 25 January 1995: Arrived by ambulance “1 week post MVA” with
primary complaint of headache for which he received a CT scan. Mentioned
was LBP since MVA. Treated with Flexeril, Motrin and light duty.
July 95: Physical therapy. Mentions paraspinal bulges, cervical and lumbar.
Seen 10 July for headache and neck stiffness. “I don’t have the pain in my left
arm and shoulder anymore ” Treated with SIQ and medication. 12 July was
seen by physical medicine consultant for trunk and neck pain; notes that MRI
showed multiple herniated discs. Diagnosis was myofascial pain syndrome.
Treatment was strengthening, aerobic conditioning and Elavil.
Earlier notes: 1988 F/U at
NHCamp LJ -LBP/strain after a fall onto his back.
Bah
Pediatric
Bathgate,
MD.
Otihopaedics
Booher
Kermit R
CApT MC, VSNR
General
orlhqmedics 4
Julia C Buck, RN.
LCDR, NC, USN
Orchopwdics
Division
Oficer
Coni& DPM
Michael A.
LT,
P&i&y
MSC, USN
DM, M.D.
Khiem D.
LCD& MC, USN
Had
an+rMierovasc#dv
Dellahfaggiore,
Eqqenr D.
LCDR, MC, USN
Genaal
Orthopaedics
Surg.
M.D.
Gillingham M.D.
Bruce L.
CDR, MC, USN
Pcdiabic
Associate Program
Orihqmdics
Director
M.D.
GlarlrLn,
Merrill
LCDR, MC, USN
General
Orihopaedics
Han&k
Lnnm
Physician
Assislml
Michael
LCDR,
General
Langworthy,
hfC, USN
Orthopoedics
M.D.
and Trauma
Lqoinl, M.D.
John M.
CApr. MC, USN
Surguy
Shoiddu
M.D.
Manm,
Richard
LCDR, MC, USN
Spine
lhofhy
CDR, MC, VSNR
Spo&
Surgery
S
M&gnu?,
M.D.
Me&&e and Knee
Surgery
McClaq,
I+t
MSC, USN
Raymond
LT.
POdiiUYy
DPM
1. McDermott, M.D.
Michael
LCDR, MC, USN
Gcneml
Orihopaedics
Muldoon,
Michael P.
CDR, MC, USN
A&d:
ficc
Reconstictive
Choinnan
M. D
Surguy
T. Nelson.
Fred
Major Joint
Scrvicc
M.D,
Alaamler
CDR(Sd),
Hand
and
I! Shin, M.D.
MC USN
Micrmwgay.
M.D.
F.
Siller,
David
CDR. MC, USN
Low.7
Erlrendty
surguy
S Webster. M.D.
MC, USN
John
C4pT.
Chaiim
Raidency
Adull Spine
Rogmm
Surgery
Direclor
Department of
Surgery
Naval Medical Center San Diego, Suite 112
Orthopaedic
34800 Bob Wilson Drive
San Diego, California 92134-l 112
(619) 532-8427, -8429
/ (619) 532-8467 Fax
Subj:
Machinegunner, Infantry
.
4.
5.
6.
.
NavCare after falling onto back
1980-Lumbar pain and stomach pain
1990-reported back spasm from auto accident occurring Sept 3rd. Civilian
8188 Back sprain treated at
July
Dee
3
care by physical therapy for “mechanical LBP ” treated with medication and requested
report from civilian
17 Sept 1990 “hit from behind ” in
“shoulder pain ”
MVA” complaining of headache, backache and
ortho (no report seen)
Regarding the 17 April 1996 history and physical
qualified for discharge on his final physical exam
patient ’s note about not being able to carry his full pack or machine gun and
stating, “my back hurts off and on and still have back spasms
Follow-up: Apparently, the patient went on to have back surgery, fusion after
leaving the USMC and difficulty or inability to return to his job as a letter carrier
in the early post-operative period. This was apparently for sciatica, although none
of those records were provided.
Conclusions and Opinion:
found the SNM
was despite the
”
nfit at the time of his
It is highly unlikely that a PEB would have foun
discharge physical examination, based on the available record and with exclusive
focus on the low back pain or neck pain complaints.
However, with consideration of back pain, severe headaches, neck pain, ankle and
knee pain, wrist pain and his other problems, it is difficult to conclude that he was fit
and able to do his duties as a machine gunner in the infantry. On the other hand, his
doctors in September, 1995 and April, 1996 found him fit to re-enlist and for
discharge, respectively, these with doctor and patient notes acknowledging the back
pain problem.
Given the course of events, with worsening of back problem, development of sciatica
(not mentioned in the records I reviewed), he clearly would not have been able to
complete a 20-year career. If progression of disease and eventual outcome are to be
considered, rather than his symptoms, record and complaints at the time of discharge,
his request is reasonable.
There is no doubt that the record substantiates the claim of service connectivity and
If the patient had included records of his
significant level of low back complaints.
outside evaluations and MRI (presumably done in response to his MVA and possibly
to litigation) more could be said about his level of symptoms and/or disability at the
time of discharge from the USMC. The record acknowledges a moderate level of
symptoms at the time of discharge. The final outcome was of increasing symptoms
Bathgate,
Bdh
Pedin@ic
Otihopaedics
MD.
Ken&R
CAPT.
GeneraI
Booher
MC0 VSNR
Orihopaaiics
Julia C Buck, RN.
LCDR NC, USN
Orthop& Division
O/ficcr
Conti,
DPM
MichaelA.
LT,
POdi&y
MSC, USN
Dao, M.D.
MC0 USN
Khiem D.
LCDR,
Hand and
Micmwcular
DrllaMa&oree,
Eugene D.
LCDR, MC, USN
General
Orthqxedics
Surg
MD.
CUingham,
M.D.
Bruce L
CDR, MC, USN
Pedi&ic
Associate
Orthopaedics
Pmgmm
Dir&or
Gladden, M.D.
Marill
LCDR, MC, USN
General
Orihqwdics
Lauren
Nurse
Gmeuisch,
Cowdinator
RN, BSN
Hanzlick
Laura
Physician
Asi.&m
Kupfer
Fncd
Physician Assistant
Lnngwvihy,
Michael
LCDR, MC, USN
Gaeral
Orthopaedics
M.D.
and
Trauma
l&win& M.D.
John M.
CAPT.
MC USN
ShoulderSqay
M.D.
M,wws,
Richard
LCD& MC, USN
spine
swgay
Molagne,
S
Timothy
CDR. MC, VSNR
Sports
Mulicine
M.D.
and Knee
Svgery
M&lay,
K
MSC, USN
Raymond
LT,
POdi<ly
DPM
McDermoq M.D.
1.
Michael
LCDR, MC, USN
General
Orthopaedics
P.
Muldoon,
Michael
CDR, MC, USN
A&t Reconstructive
yiee Chairman
M.D.
Surgrry
T.
N&on,
Fred
Mnjor Joint Service
M.D.
Alaander
CDR(Sel),
Hnnrl and
Y. Shin, M.D.
MC, USN
Miimswgay.
Sider, M.D.
F.
David
CDR MC USN
Lmver
Edrendty
swgeq
M.D.
S
Webster,
Jokn
&4pI, MC, USN
Ch&man
Residency
Ad& Spine
F+qram Director
Surgery
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808154
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your frequent misconduct and especially the final 243 day period of unauthorized absence. I see no evidence to show that (his) bad conduct discharge whole on active duty (was) in any way related to psychiatric symptomology.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00329
Headaches were noted after the MVA though. The VA rated the headaches, neck and shoulder separately. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Low Back Pain 5237 20% Headaches Tied to Cervical, Trapezius and Shoulder...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00116
VA initial rating used the Service treatment records with limited range of motion, with limited ROM, with flexion 45/45, extension 20/45, rotation 40/80 on the right and 30/80 on the left with painful motion shown. The VA rated the knee at 10% based on Service treatment records showing limited range of motion, with flexion to 130/140˚. Commander's memo specifically noted neck and back pain as unfitting and did not include any duty limitations due to CI's right knee.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02050
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) Fibromyalgia Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00078
The CI was evaluated for reported symptoms of paresthesias of the right upper extremity, but cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 9 January 2001 did not show spinal canal stenosis or nerve encroachment and nerve conduction studies on 13 April 2001 did not show any evidence of radicuolpathy.The CI was involved in another MVA on 26 June 2001 and was seen in the ER for “right shoulder, neck and low back pain;” the exam noted only right trapezius muscle tenderness, no spinal tenderness,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01841
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: CASE: PD1201841 BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20130619 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00494
He reported upper back pain, neck pain and occipital pain after the MVA. CRPS was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions(see rating chart below) for PEB adjudication.The Informal PEB(IPEB) adjudicated “chronic regional pain syndrome”and a related failed back surgery syndrome as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600175
A: Stress fracture right Femur (illegible) P: Physical Therapy Instructions and Handouts: Ankle Sprain complete treatment with tilt board continued; Contract/Relax buddy stretches adductors; Isometric Quad exercise Ice 2-3 x day (illegible) Duty status: MRP (Protocol UB/Swim/C.C.) Continue with UB protocol until 100% pain free.960426: Medical entry: Sports Medicine Clinic, Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego CA, HM1 K. J. R_, USN: Patient (Applicant) here for 2 week follow up and Eval for...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600588
Closing, the only request I make of the board is to allow me a second chance to serve my country, and to prove that I am capable, and can rise up and surpass the challenges I would be presented serving in the United States Armed Forces.” Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4)Letter from E_ J. W_, MD, B_ Bone and Joint Clinic, dtd July 25, 2005 (2...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01253
Two weeks later, he was medically evaluated and given a muscle relaxant medication, which improved his symptoms. The Board considered the MEB NARSUM to be the most probative for a rating at the time of separation because it was the most proximate to the date of separation, and consistent withthe onset of pain limitations from the VA C&P examination and the MEB physical examination. The MEB physical exam on 12 July 2004, 4 months prior to separation, noted decreased and painful cervical...