Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07958-99
Original file (07958-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT 
NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

THE 

OF 

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 

2037~5100

TRG
Docket No: 7958-99
19 September 2000

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 September 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
and policies.
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is enclosed.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support

Your allegations of error and

The Board noted that you have completed 17

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
years and 26 days of active service and are not eligible for
retirement from the Marine Corps due to length of service. In
addition, since your disability was rated at less than 30% in
Therefore, the
1968, you were discharged with severance pay.
Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval

record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

w. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280RUss~LL  ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103

IN REPLY REFER   TO:

1760
MMSR-6J
28 Jul 00

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Ref:

(a) MMER Route Sheet of  

13Ju100, Docket No. 7958-99

Encl:

(1)  Statement of Service

uests an advisory opinion o
equest to have his records
y reason of permanent physical disability

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07824-99

    Original file (07824-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. B request to have his records corrected to show that he is eligible for retirement from the Marine Corps.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06187-99

    Original file (06187-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 and 31 March 2000, copies of which are attached. Branch (RAM-5) reenlisted Staff Sergeant Marine Corps Reserve at the rank of staff sergeant with his enlistment date (980218) as his date of rank.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00283-01

    Original file (00283-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 21 March 2001 and undated, copies of which are attached. References (b) through (d) refer to clinical studies on head injury and multiple sclerosis. '_s request to have his records corrected to show that he was retired from the Marine Corps by reason of "combat related" physical disability in the rank of major.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-99

    Original file (01187-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    authoriz s been 344 days of became eligible for promotion to Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) promotion board however, was not selected due to keen 1993 selection message. selected for promotion by any of the boards who considered his record. Head, Reserve Affairs Personnel Management Branch Reserve Affairs Division By direction r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA I7 LEJEUNE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05192-99

    Original file (05192-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 January 2002. DC 20374-5023 5420 Ser: 00-21 7 Nov 2000 From: To: Director, Executive Director, Boa Naval Council of Personnel Boards rd for Correction of Nava 1 Records Sub] : REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER Ref: (a) Chairman, (b) SECNAVINST BCNR JRE:jdh DN: 1850.4D 5192-99 ltr of 26 Jul 00 This responds to reference (a) which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04639-99

    Original file (04639-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00955-00

    Original file (00955-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board's opinion, 4. vote, is that Report A should remain a part of Captain official military record. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the Directed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps fitness report of 980117 to 980904. failures of selection. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the Captain record and SMC Major he successfully petitioned the Duty fitness report of 940201 to 940731. requests removal of his failures of selection.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04718-99

    Original file (04718-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. IN REPLY REFER TO: 1400/3 MMPR-2 13 Mar 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF FORMER - ‘ a retired Marine indicates that he completed his he grade of probationary corporal and should have been promoted to the grade of sergeant prior to his retirement from the Marine Corps on 22...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06336-03

    Original file (06336-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 10 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 18 July 2003, a copy of which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04434-02

    Original file (04434-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance applicable to the proceedings of this Board. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...