Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07955-01
Original file (07955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y   A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

LCC1:dd.i 
Docket  No:  7955-01 
9  April  2002 

This  is  in  reference  to  your  application  for correction of  your  naval  record  pi~rsuant to  the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the  United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-nienlber panel  of  the  Board  for  Correction of  Naval  Records, sitting  in  executive 
session, considered  your  application  on  9  April  2002.  Your  allegations of  error and  iri.justice 
were  reviewed  i n   accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures  applicable to  the 
proceedings of  this  Board.  Documentary  material  considered  by  the  Board  consi stetl of  your 
application,  together with  all  nlaterial  sub~nittetl in  support  thereof,  your  naval  record  and 
applicable statutes,  regulations and  policies.  111 addition,  the  Board  considered  the  advisory 
opinion  furnished  by  NPC  memorandum 5420 Ser  P80B10305 of  2 1  December 2001, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientioirs consideration of  the  entire  record,  the  Board  found  that  the 
evidence submitted  was  insufticient to  establish  the existence of  probable material  error or 
injustice.  In  this connection,  the  Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly,  your  application  has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members  of  the panel  will  be  furnished  upon  request. 

It  is  regretted  that  the  circumstances of  your  case  are si~cli that  favorable action  cannot be  taken. 
You  are entitled to  have  the  Board  reconsider its decision  upon  subnlission of  new  and  material 
I n   this  regard,  it  is  important 
evidence or other  matter  not  previously  considered  by  the  Board. 
to  keep in  mind  that  a presunlption  of  regularity attaches to  all  ofticial  records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction  of  an  ofticial  naval  record,  the  burden  is  on  the  applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable  nlaterial  error  or  i~l~justice. 

Sincerely, 

W .   DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT O F  T H E  NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

5420 
Ser P80B/0305 

DEC 2 1  2001 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Subi:  REOUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN CASE OF 

-  .  ----- 

Encl:  (1) BCNR File 07955-01 

1. Per reference (a), enclosure  (1) is returned with the 
recommendation that -request 
rank be denied. 

for change in date of 

eferences NAVADMIN 262/00 as justification for 

change in date of rank, however his name does not appear on the 
message.  Therefore there are no grounds to support- 
request . 

Deputy w e c t o r ,  Active and 
Reserve Officer Career 
Progression Division 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00852-02

    Original file (00852-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:yrj Docket No: 852-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application for correction of your naval record pilrsuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material cunsitleretl by the Board consisted of your application, together with all nlaterial si~b~nitted applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08536-01

    Original file (08536-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of rhe Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consitleretl your application 011 18 June 2002. I n addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientioi~s consideration of the entire record, h e Board found that the evidence subn~itted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or I n this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the co~nnients contained in ili.justice. This is an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01

    Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110026 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl : (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07599-01

    Original file (07599-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The following is provided in response to reference (a): b. J s case has been reviewed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08211-01

    Original file (08211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-tiiember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on I8 June 2002, Your allegations of error and ill-justice were reviewed in accortlance with administrative regulations and l~rocrtlures applicable to tlie proceedings of this Board. Airman requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Airman not have an EB contract nor an extension in his -does service record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03316-01

    Original file (03316-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Docirlnentary ~iiaterial considered by the Boartl consisted of your application, together with all tilaterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the Board deny -s request to enroll In the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07571-01

    Original file (07571-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. In some cases, members signed their DD Form 2057 indicating they could enroll at any time while on active duty.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01

    Original file (07306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07770-01

    Original file (07770-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2002. Docu~iientary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all niaterial subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted early on 29 September 2001 for four years at the request of the Navy.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06013-01

    Original file (06013-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all ~naterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110047 31 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj:...