DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
10 October 2001
8062-00
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 October 2.001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve Advanced Pay Grade Program
(APG) on 11 May 1999.
prepared by the Naval Reserve Professional Development Center,
dated 1 September 1999,
from the APG program because of unauthorized absence,
insubordination and disobedience.
part, as follows:
states that you were being disenrolled
An administrative remarks (page 13) entry
The page 13 further states, in
Be advised that based on your personal conduct on 31
August 1999 and 1 September 1999, you will not be
readmitted into further Advanced Pay Grade training
courses and it is recommended that you be
administratively separated from the Naval Service. . . . .
Apparently, you were then returned to your parent unit to be
processed for an administrative separation.
support the separation processing is not filed in your service
record.
that you were separated from the Naval Reserve on that date
because of entry level performance and conduct.
The entry also
indicates that you were not recommended for reenlistment and were
However, a page 13 entry, dated 5 November 1999, states
The documentation to'
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board believes that the page 13 entries were sufficient to
Regulations require a
support separation action in your case.
non-recommendation for reenlistment or the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of
entry level performance and conduct.
no differently than many others who failed to complete initial
training, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
decision not to recommended you for reenlistment and the
assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
Since you have been treated
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05109-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05891-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Naval Reserve, Board requesting in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the entry level separation issued on 6 October 2000. filed enclosure (1) with this that his naval record be corrected to of'Messrs. CONCLUSION: The Board agrees with the advisory opinion that Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial relief. c....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06928-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that on 11 March 2003 you enlisted in the advanced pay grade (APG) program of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02643-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Any adverse reenlistment code may be waived and reenlistment or reserve affiliation authorized in the appropriate circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05850-01
A You were marked 3.0 ("meets The reporting senior noted The evaluation for the period ending 15 July 2000 showed you were now promotable and meeting standards in all categories. discharged from your second enlistment, you had not advanced Therefore, you met the criteria for reenlistment when For the first reenlistment, an However, at the time you were 2 Since you The Board found beyond E-3 and were not recommended for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02987-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. marks assigned for the period 1 February 1992 to 25 July 1992 are not entered on the page 9. In addition, the page 9 clearly shows that you were not eligible for reenlistment on 25 July 1992. that your performance either...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07238-02
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with al material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulatio opinion furnished attached. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to robable material error or injustice. nlisted via the Accelerated Initial Accession the Advanced Pay Grade mporary e Army Reserve, vice Veteran e, however, e. she should have been accessed (OSVET) program or Prior Service her ASVAB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07324-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07021-00
on 14 December 1999. and admitted to using alcohol 650 times and marijuana 1900 times. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated from Navy recruit training due to In addition such a code is assigned when an drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03945-98
I do not have a (SSAN) and I have never had a (SSAN). On 5 March 1997 you submitted a request through the chain of command to extend your enlistment in accordance with the agreement.of 6 December 1996. later.- Officer-in-Charge (OIC) of the servicing personnel support detachment (PSD) which reads, in part, as follows: that the SSAN will be printed at but further states that However, on 12 March 1997 you submitted a letter to the That request was approved one day B90102d of Section A,...