NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07800-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: *ii Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show he was honorably discharged on 28 April 1997. That Petitioner's naval record be further corrected by b. removing all documentation after 28 April 1997 concerning his discharge processing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07801-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an existing extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Rothlein, Mr. Zsalman, and Ms. Hardbower, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07809-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 1, a copy of which is attached. Advancement to Chief Pett 2. by a selection board action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07813-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LP:ddj J Docket No: 78 13-01 3 1 October 2001 : Chairman, Board (‘orrection of Naval Records Secretary 01‘ for the Navy (a) Title IO 1J.S.C. 155 2 140 w/attachments (1) DD Form (2) Series of Docu (3) Subject ’s naval nlc‘n st record From To: Ref: Encl : Pursuant to the provisions ot‘ reference (a), 1. filed enclosure (1) corrected to show Mitli this eiilistnic3it in kurtI il requsting,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07814-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 7814-01 3 1 October 200 1 From To: : Chairman, Secretary Uoard for 01‘ the Navy (‘orrection of Naval Records Ref: (a) Title IO 1J.S.c:. I’ctitioner‘s :~pplication has commented to the effect that the CONCLIJSION Upon contents following corrective review of and enclosure (2), action. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07819-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Neuschafer, and Ms. Davies, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. as enclosure (2), the Board concluded CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07822-00
you exercised poor judgment and immaturity in the handling of your financial affairs, been involved in two incidents of The reporting senior noted that during this period Your performance as an EW2 However, the domestic violence, and failed your semi-annual physical readiness test. discharged on 24 March 2000 with an You were not recommended for retention and were honorably RX-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07824-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. B request to have his records corrected to show that he is eligible for retirement from the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07826-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted ‘in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB). In his petition, -claims his recruiter promised him an EB and Seaman requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07827-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs Dunn, Neuschafer, and M S on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07828-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07835-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. The Board believed that a record which included three nonjudicial punishments and a conviction by a special court-martial was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. In addition, regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals serving in pay grade E-2 on completion of an extended period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07837-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board 2000, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director _- Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07838-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. iti_justice on 6 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and especially in light of itl.justice warranting the the Docket No: 7838-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was promoted to paygrade E-7 effective 1 November 1999. b. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07840-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 7840-O RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07843-00
The Board found that the reporting senior adequately justified the adverse marks assigned in the contested fitness report. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280RUSSELLROA QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 D 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 2000 \ 4 NOV MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07847-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the BU rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07849-00
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board 2000, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. plagiarize the work of another student while at the Staff Noncommissioned Officers Academy (SNCO Academy), and that his disenrollment was unwarranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07855-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Recorder Acting Recorder Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07857-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 February 2000. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the assignment of the RE-3B reenlistment code. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07863-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments MME:R MSG 02 13292 OCT 01 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07869-00
7869-00 6 April 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of Documentary material considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07872-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07879-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. You enlisted in the Navy on 9 June 1999 at age 17. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07880-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. You were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07892-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07897-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07900-00
Punishment imposed e. On 16 August 1995, Petitioner was honorably released from active duty by reason of "Completion of Required Active Service" and transferred to the Naval Reserve. concludes that it would be appropriate and just to show that Petitioner was placed on terminal leave on 16 August 1995 and was honorably released from active duty on 31 August 1995 when he would complete two years of active service. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07908-01
opinion furnished by which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of with all subnlitted in support thereof, your naval record and II addition, the Board considered the advisory I I~~~I~~oI-;II~~~~II~~ 140013 MMPR 2 of 13 November 2001, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07912-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. record, and you have submitted none, to show that your actions while in recruit training were not as described in the psychiatric evaluation or that the diagnosis was not supported by the history and other information presented to the psychologist. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07914-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07919-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 December 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. received is the only code authorized for Sailors discharged for failing to meet procurement It also noted that the reenlistment code you medical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07920-00
That Petj.tioner’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Date of Report Reporting Senior 98SepO3 Period of Report From To b. On 13 November 1999 the report was The report was returned to the reporting senior for correction and resubmission. A review of the member ’s headquarters record revealed The report was received without the member returned to the reporting senior for correction and tracer action was initiated and the report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07925-00
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07928-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07928-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 December 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07929-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were the subject of seven disciplinary actions within a period of less than two years. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07930-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07932-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the reenlistment executed on or about 3 May 2001 is for a term of 2 years, vice 4 years. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Neuschafer, and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07933-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 29 July 1952 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for participating in homosexual acts. Your request was granted on 16 August 1952 and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07936-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 7936-01 21 November 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for'correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. t- '7 _ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 10 and 30 January 2001, copies of which are attached. This page 11 entry has the appearance of not recommending her for promotion for the month of June 2000 'after the fact'. or recommending her for promotion and later 'will not promote' was in accordance with what is promote her.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07939-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2001. that your recruiter assisted you in concealing the foregoing medical disorders, contains none, concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07940-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to show the reenlistment executed on or about 30 May 2001 is for a term of 2 years, vice 4 years. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and iI?iustice on 14 November 2001 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07943-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant commander he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board, vice the FY 02 Naval Reserve Line...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07944-01
15.57 RECOMh4ENLIATlON: That Petitioner ’s naval record 3 January 200 effective I6 October 200 I lx~yg~xlc I is in bc 172 corrc’ctc~tl, and \\~hcre appropriate. l‘urthcr corrected to show Docket No: 7944-01 to show that the enlistment of atlv;~nce~~~t to paygrade E3 4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) Records (32 Code of Federal present at the Board record of the Board 01‘ the reviwl Rc~gulations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07946-01
1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments 1400/4A CMC memorandum Subject’s naval record MMPR 2 of 7 September 2001 Pursuant to 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Novelio, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner 1 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. enciosllre and especially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07949-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Military Awards Branch, Headquarters, Marine Corps, dated 27 April 2000, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of...